Jump to content
SportsWrath

Tenders


Mr. P

Recommended Posts

From what I read $2.9M is the highest tender possible... not sure how that works either.

 

Restricted Free Agency is much different than normal unrestricted free agency. The giants for instance have three possibilities: To tender (re-sign to a pre-specified one year contract), re-sign (to a non-tendered contract), or decline to tender or re-sign.

 

Going simplest to hardest:

-Decline to tender or resign. They become an unrestricted free agent

-Re-sign to a non-tendered contract

-Tender a one year RFA contract. For a player in question, the team chooses if it would like to offer a draft round 1-7 tender. Round 1 tenders have the highest value (this year, 2.9 million) down to round 7 with the lowest value.

 

Now, here's an example. The giants tendered Victor Cruz a 1st round, one year 2.9 million dollar contract. Other teams can offer Cruz more lucrative, longer term contracts, HOWEVER with two caveats: 1-The Giants can opt to match any offer other teams put on the table, 2-If the Giants do NOT opt to match other team's offers, the team signing Cruz will have to give us their 1st round draft pick this year. If a team does not have a 1st round pick, I believe such a team cannot make an offer.

 

RFA functions almost like an insurance policy protecting these types of free agents from being signed elsewhere by making it painful for other teams to offer them contracts (literally restricting their ability to do so). The other team not only has to offer the RFA big money, the other team also has to give up a draft pick, and this is often the key deterrent, particularly for teams high in the draft order. E.g. A team like Kansas City - KC can sign Cruz, however IF they do, they have to give up the #1 pick overall. With this type of a tender, Reese has virtually wiped out teams 1-20 from making Cruz an offer (unless a team has no issue with relinquishing a top 20 draft pick for Cruz).

 

Additionally, I believe a team can also offer multiple tenders to an RFA. For example, say the giants wanted to offer a 1st AND a 2nd round tender to Cruz because they think he's valuable. In this case, the contract would be 1 year 4.9 million, and any team trying to sign him away from the giants would have to give up a 1st and 2nd round pick to us.

 

Make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Restricted Free Agency is much different than normal unrestricted free agency. The giants for instance have three possibilities: To tender (re-sign to a pre-specified one year contract), re-sign (to a non-tendered contract), or decline to tender or re-sign.

 

Going simplest to hardest:

-Decline to tender or resign. They become an unrestricted free agent

-Re-sign to a non-tendered contract

-Tender a one year RFA contract. For a player in question, the team chooses if it would like to offer a draft round 1-7 tender. Round 1 tenders have the highest value (this year, 2.9 million) down to round 7 with the lowest value.

 

Now, here's an example. The giants tendered Victor Cruz a 1st round, one year 2.9 million dollar contract. Other teams can offer Cruz more lucrative, longer term contracts, HOWEVER with two caveats: 1-The Giants can opt to match any offer other teams put on the table, 2-If the Giants do NOT opt to match other team's offers, the team signing Cruz will have to give us their 1st round draft pick this year. If a team does not have a 1st round pick, I believe such a team cannot make an offer.

 

RFA functions almost like an insurance policy protecting these types of free agents from being signed elsewhere by making it painful for other teams to offer them contracts (literally restricting their ability to do so). The other team not only has to offer the RFA big money, the other team also has to give up a draft pick, and this is often the key deterrent, particularly for teams high in the draft order. E.g. A team like Kansas City - KC can sign Cruz, however IF they do, they have to give up the #1 pick overall. With this type of a tender, Reese has virtually wiped out teams 1-20 from making Cruz an offer (unless a team has no issue with relinquishing a top 20 draft pick for Cruz).

 

Additionally, I believe a team can also offer multiple tenders to an RFA. For example, say the giants wanted to offer a 1st AND a 2nd round tender to Cruz because they think he's valuable. In this case, the contract would be 1 year 4.9 million, and any team trying to sign him away from the giants would have to give up a 1st and 2nd round pick to us.

 

Make sense?

 

Awesome explanation, thanks Shake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ralph Vacchiano ‏@RVacchianoNYDN

 

Mara says Giants have made Cruz "a very substantial offer" that "would make him a very wealthy young man." His agent wants to test market.

 

You think Cruz would say, "Hey, I want to stay a Giant." but agents brainwash these guys. They are almost as bad as politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think Cruz would say, "Hey, I want to stay a Giant." but agents brainwash these guys. They are almost as bad as politicians.

 

Isn't it due to the fact that agents get paid off comission, so the more they can get their players the more they make?

 

You think the NFL or atleast the NFLPA would have some regulations on the fact that agents don't really look out for the players, only how much they make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ralph Vacchiano ‏@RVacchianoNYDN

 

Mara says Giants have made Cruz "a very substantial offer" that "would make him a very wealthy young man." His agent wants to test market.

 

No, that offer would make him RICH. John Mara is WEALTHY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of peope are saying the diffrance between the 5-32 players in this year draft is nothing. Some teams might be willing to take a chance on Cruz just because the draft doesn't hold a lot .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Restricted Free Agency is much different than normal unrestricted free agency. The giants for instance have three possibilities: To tender (re-sign to a pre-specified one year contract), re-sign (to a non-tendered contract), or decline to tender or re-sign.

 

Going simplest to hardest:

-Decline to tender or resign. They become an unrestricted free agent

-Re-sign to a non-tendered contract

-Tender a one year RFA contract. For a player in question, the team chooses if it would like to offer a draft round 1-7 tender. Round 1 tenders have the highest value (this year, 2.9 million) down to round 7 with the lowest value.

 

Now, here's an example. The giants tendered Victor Cruz a 1st round, one year 2.9 million dollar contract. Other teams can offer Cruz more lucrative, longer term contracts, HOWEVER with two caveats: 1-The Giants can opt to match any offer other teams put on the table, 2-If the Giants do NOT opt to match other team's offers, the team signing Cruz will have to give us their 1st round draft pick this year. If a team does not have a 1st round pick, I believe such a team cannot make an offer.

 

RFA functions almost like an insurance policy protecting these types of free agents from being signed elsewhere by making it painful for other teams to offer them contracts (literally restricting their ability to do so). The other team not only has to offer the RFA big money, the other team also has to give up a draft pick, and this is often the key deterrent, particularly for teams high in the draft order. E.g. A team like Kansas City - KC can sign Cruz, however IF they do, they have to give up the #1 pick overall. With this type of a tender, Reese has virtually wiped out teams 1-20 from making Cruz an offer (unless a team has no issue with relinquishing a top 20 draft pick for Cruz).

 

Additionally, I believe a team can also offer multiple tenders to an RFA. For example, say the giants wanted to offer a 1st AND a 2nd round tender to Cruz because they think he's valuable. In this case, the contract would be 1 year 4.9 million, and any team trying to sign him away from the giants would have to give up a 1st and 2nd round pick to us.

 

Make sense?

 

Damn, who wouldda thought a liberal commie can be so well versed on American football :)

 

Thanks, Shakes :TU:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...