-
Content Count
25,898 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About mastershake
-
Rank
Hall-of-Famer
Recent Profile Visitors
732 profile views
-
It's possible Gallman turned down offers for less than $3mm.
-
Yeah, I like him at G or as an emergency/plan B tackle if Peart/Solder don't work out (and if Slater is gone at #11). Possible trade down candidate who we target perhaps at #15-20.
-
I agree he has value. It's possible he received low offers (like 1yr $1mm) and refused them, perhaps thinking he should get a deal more like Booker's 2yr $6mm. At this point, he's looking like Orleans Darkwa... Remember him? He was in his mid 20's, coming off a decent 600-700 yard fill in season behind a shit OL, decent backup/rotational back in general, but no one signed him. I feel bad for the guy. He's better than people think.
-
That's very possible as well, lol.
-
I'm surprised we didn't just bring him back on a 1yr $1mm deal. Instead we pay Booker 2 yrs $6mm. DG overpaying for backups as usual.
-
Ever since Pitts blew away his pro day workout, he's been listed as top 10. I don't think he falls to us.
-
Why is Sewell sliding though? Are the concerns legit? He seems like more of a traits guy than an NFL ready lineman like Slater.
-
You know me....I'm obviously prioritizing OL (I think interior line is a far bigger priority), plus I've recommended LB Parsons before, so I sort of agree with you here. Slater would be nice; he seems to be the only safe pick on the OL that high (now I'm reading all sorts of scary stuff on Sewell). Trading down for Vera-Tucker or Tevin Jenkins (as guards) might be an option as well.
-
I'd be okay with anything WR, TE (Pitts), OL, or LB (Parsons) at #11. Obviously I'd prefer OL if Slater is around. I'm starting to lean away from drafting a CB in round 1 at #11 (unless we trade down significantly) because we already have two big $10mm plus contracts allocated to CB (plus cap/high draft investments in three players at S as well), and lean away from EDGE as well, as the more I read about this year's edge rushers, the less and less I like at #11 (again, perhaps if we trade down and get Joseph Ossai or Jaelen Phillips...I'm just not confident in Rosseau, Paye, Owah, or Ojula
-
LOL...I think it goes back to my time playing HS football. I was a running back. I was nothing without my OL.
-
No matter how many offensive lineman we draft, there's an 80% chance Shake will still complain about the offensive line.
-
All seem like good players. What's the deal with Carlos Basham? His production, workouts, and profile seem like that of a 1st rounder, but most mocks have him falling to rounds 2-3. Seems like he could be a steal there.
-
Why would that be argumentative? It's very possible they go offense at #11. At this point I think it's a toss up whether they go offense vs defense. I also don't think it would upset anyone whichever way they go (unless the pick itself is a weird reach).
-
Everyone seems to be talking character issues and mediocre arm length on Sewell....so him falling to #11 doesn't seem like it's impossible anymore (I wouldn't count on it but I also wouldn't be surprised if it happens, especially if you see a run on QBs and WRs in the top 10. If we do somehow land him, what do we do with him? Play him at G or T? @ BC why is Slater not suited for Guard?
-
He sorta had a down year last year, plus was injured, is a 2 down player as Temp pointed out, and it doesn't help that he never really lived up to his #12 overall selection. But I'll take that on a 1 yr prove it type deal, or at least for quality depth. He was a solid starter at one point in his career, including the 2019 Super Bowl Pats.