BlueInCanada Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Sephiroth said: And their plan was DREW FUCKING LOCK? This can't actually be the plan... What QB could we afford otherwise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman_NYG Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 With this historically pathetic O-Line, it was a no brainer that there would be an injury guarantee. I for one am actually glad that Jones made his bag here considering how the Giants have fucked him up ever since he got here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 9 hours ago, BlueInCanada said: What QB could we afford otherwise? A lot if we hadn't given 30 mil to an 8 sack/ year EDGE. I know there's not a lot of good QBs this offseason in FA but Drew Lock is awful... this CAN'T be the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Sephiroth said: A lot if we hadn't given 30 mil to an 8 sack/ year EDGE. I know there's not a lot of good QBs this offseason in FA but Drew Lock is awful... this CAN'T be the plan. Welcome to the rebuild, where we get shit QBs till we find the new franchise QB. Or as I call it the post Eli era lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 We're pretty much where most teams are in terms of QB situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazedDogs Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 12 hours ago, Herc said: Either they don’t expect jones to be healthy, or we aren’t drafting a qb I think its the former, not the latter. And before we panic, there's a lot of room between 'Lock will have the opportunity to compete' and 'Lock is the week 1 starter'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Plus if we plan on drafting a qb early, and are paying jones, we can’t really get too crazy with the third guy. Supposedly we wanted Winston but didn’t want spend more than 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 The Vikings have entered the chat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 15 hours ago, Herc said: Either they don’t expect jones to be healthy, or we aren’t drafting a qb Or we may not have a shot at the top 3 QBs so it is between Jones and Lock...or we do get one of the top 3 and it's an open competition given the draft pick is still a rookie after all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Yeah that’s what I meant. Either lock vs rook with jones on pup or lock vs jones. I don’t honestly think it’s the latter though because if jones is healthy and they don’t draft a qb it’s because they still believe in jones and he’s therefore the penciled in starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 I swear to Christ this had better be a smokescreen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 45 minutes ago, Sephiroth said: I swear to Christ this had better be a smokescreen. why? Because he wasn’t thought of as highly before the combine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 Wonder how many people wanna play with Jones? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 15 minutes ago, Mr. P said: why? Because he wasn’t thought of as highly before the combine? My view on him lines up almost exactly with NFL.com's analysis of him. In a nutshell, he looks like he could be a competent starter and nothing more, with developmental potential. That's not a top-10 pick, that's a guy you take a shot on in the second or third round. When I look at him, I say, "he's fine." You need top-10 picks to be more than fine, they need to be playmakers. Quote Overview Enigmatic quarterback lacking the measurables and splash throws associated with early round quarterbacks but possessing elements that require more study and consideration. McCarthy lacks frame thickness and a plus arm. He’s fairly poised in the pocket but is average as a pocket passer. His ball placement and timing need to improve to help mitigate an average operation time due to a windup release. McCarthy doesn’t seek to play out of structure but is fairly consistent at making positive plays when it happens and ramps up his focus late in games and on third downs. He is confident and seems to have the ability to take slights and digest it as competitive fuel. McCarthy should continue to improve as a passer, but he fails to stand out in many of the areas that tend to be predictive of top-level success in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Yep..I want no parts of McCarthy. 2nd round maybe...but he won't be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jranieli Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 I just want a wide receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazedDogs Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 3 hours ago, gmenroc said: Yep..I want no parts of McCarthy. 2nd round maybe...but he won't be there. I wouldn’t be mad at a trade back to later in the first, then pick McCarthy. I think. It’s a based on shit I’ve read opinion, don’t feel like I’ve seen enough of him to judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman_NYG Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 10 hours ago, jranieli said: I just want a wide receiver. This - id be stoked if they get either Rome or Nabers at No.6 - considering MHJ will be gone by then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I am in the camp of getting one of the top 3 QBs if you can do so without having to pay an extreme premium to do so. But I just don't see those top 3 teams seperating from those picks without a 2nd this year and a 1st next...and maybe even then some. So if QBs go 123, I am good with Odunze or Nabors. I worry a little about Nabors given the comparisons he will get to OBJ (LSU WR to the Giants)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Chicago traded fields to the steelers. #1 pick out of the question now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BronxRik Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Offer the entire Oline$1 million at the end of the season for not allowing any sacks/pressures. They can divvy up the million at the end of the season. Also fine any olineman $100,00 who gives up a sack during the season. I bet the sucky line fixes itself. Fine Jones if he takes off running. Bench him if he doesn't throw 8 TD's by week 4. These things have a way of working themselves out, ya feel me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virginia Giant Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 19 hours ago, Herc said: Chicago traded fields to the steelers. #1 pick out of the question now Think the top 3 picks are locked in unless we or Minny completely sells the farm and blows NE out of the water with an offer. Both 2 and 3 need a qb, and both have new head coaches that can basically start their tenure with the dream of getting your guy right off the bat. Only way they don't is if one of us just says fuck it and offers multiple 1sts and more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 And I really hope Minnesota jumps to 4 or 5 and takes McCarthy out of the equation for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now