Virginia Giant Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 And you don't run once? I don't care who had final say in that series, we drive down the field, they can't stop Jacobs and you throw on 1st and 5 and 2nd and 5? Most bone headed play calling ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 And you don't run once? I don't care who had final say in that series, we drive down the field, they can't stop Jacobs and you throw on 1st and 5 and 2nd and 5? Most bone headed play calling ever. ..and it gave the Eagles time to get down the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 gilbride sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virginia Giant Posted January 11, 2009 Author Share Posted January 11, 2009 I don't ever want to see that fat cock sucking Gillbride in Giants stadium again. This has been the most amateur offensive play calling I have seen in my entire fucking life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I don't ever want to see that fat cock sucking Gillbride in Giants stadium again. This has been the most amateur offensive play calling I have seen in my entire fucking life. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Watch us fire Gilfuck McFuckstein and hire some new guy who is to committed to the run and we have to go threw the same shit because all we're doing is running. Fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarence the Blue Puppet Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Watch us fire Gilfuck McFuckstein and hire some new guy who is to committed to the run and we have to go threw the same shit because all we're doing is running. Fuck. That would be our luck (shooting self in head smiley) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Thank God there are not too many run only coordinators left out there then....because we need a 60-40 split. More intermediate passing to the backs and the tight end. And a go to guy who is tall and come down with the contested catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Thank God there are not too many run only coordinators left out there then....because we need a 60-40 split. More intermediate passing to the backs and the tight end. And a go to guy who is tall and come down with the contested catch. So Cassell without Welker? Maybe we should get Sproles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 So Cassell without Welker? Maybe we should get Sproles. Just frustration talking here Bro....probably our only real option is to bring back Al Capone AKA Plaxico Burress. As Pdouble pointed out there are not that many options out there for leading WR. And as far as OC's go...what can we do. But we just upped his (Plaxico) asshole factor by showing we struggle without him. We either treat him like an LT with one set of rules for him and another set for everyone else; or we find some way of reaching into his enigmatic brain (what there is of it) and find out what motivates him. An unenviable task either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppodlesny Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Buddy Ryan should have hit Gilbride hard enough so he was never able to coach again....he absolutely stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 The running game could have easily won that game for us. This is what I was talking about when I said 'forcing balance'. What good is balance when you lose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Just frustration talking here Bro....probably our only real option is to bring back Al Capone AKA Plaxico Burress. As Pdouble pointed out there are not that many options out there for leading WR. And as far as OC's go...what can we do. But we just upped his (Plaxico) asshole factor by showing we struggle without him. We either treat him like an LT with one set of rules for him and another set for everyone else; or we find some way of reaching into his enigmatic brain (what there is of it) and find out what motivates him. An unenviable task either way. who knows, maybe the whole incident plus the fear of getting cut and losing 28 mil for a few weeks was the wakeup call he needed. im not optimistic though. i still think we should bring him back. we'r enot the same w/o him and i dont want to give up the picks necessary to get boldin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 The running game could have easily won that game for us. This is what I was talking about when I said 'forcing balance'. What good is balance when you lose? Thats what kills me, we could have won it with the run game. Fuckin Gilbride goes to the air. :brooding: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 i still think we should bring him back. we'r enot the same w/o him and i dont want to give up the picks necessary to get boldin BTW you were right, I couldn't have been more wrong. No way we can play the same caliber of football without Burress. Even in a bad year for him. The loss shows up everywhere on offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 BTW you were right, I couldn't have been more wrong. No way we can play the same caliber of football without Burress. Even in a bad year for him. The loss shows up everywhere on offense. Agreed. It wasnt the same after he left, I have to admit that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 BTW you were right, I couldn't have been more wrong. No way we can play the same caliber of football without Burress. Even in a bad year for him. The loss shows up everywhere on offense. i think he would've bailed out eli a lot yesterday. if there were someone else out there as good as burress i'd be fine w/ cutting him loose but boldin's gonna cost a lot of picks and while he's arguably better than burress he isn't the same kind of tall receiver who you can just throw it up there with. personally i thought we should've activated burress for this game. 4 games was enough of a suspension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 i think he would've bailed out eli a lot yesterday. if there were someone else out there as good as burress i'd be fine w/ cutting him loose but boldin's gonna cost a lot of picks and while he's arguably better than burress he isn't the same kind of tall receiver who you can just throw it up there with. personally i thought we should've activated burress for this game. 4 games was enough of a suspension I agree. A lot of those high throws would've hit him in the hands. You can also see the difference in edge runs and bunch runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 not to mention toomer would've had more than one look all game. smith's looks were down a lot too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishgutmartyr Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Was he really able to play at all, though? He did put a bullet in his leg. I have no idea how much damage it caused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Was he really able to play at all, though? He did put a bullet in his leg. I have no idea how much damage it caused. I think the original medical judgement was 2 weeks. It was supposed to be just a graze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 SHHHHHHH!!! We want someone else to hire him! Don't give the game away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 yeah i think that's our only shot. i dont see the giants firing this guy 1 year removed from a superbowl victory. unless al davis saves us i think we're stuck w/ him another year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted January 12, 2009 Share Posted January 12, 2009 Was he really able to play at all, though? He did put a bullet in his leg. I have no idea how much damage it caused. It was only suppose to be a 2 week at most healing time, from what I read it was only a minor graze. He could of been back easily for the playoffs..oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now