boohyah Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Osi is a reserve. We have the same amount of pro bowlers as Miami and Oakland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feefifoefum Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 We suck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 And Pro Bowl voters suck. Fred Taylor once again robbed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 lol go Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 hahah funny, i see no Plaxico Burress...everyone was claiming he was a pro bowler... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 I thought Osi and Strahan both deserved to be there. Snee deserves it too... and I haven't looked at the Pro Bowl list but I'll just go ahead and GUESS that Davis from the Cowboys and that fat guy from the Eagles made it over him... cuz they are the "names." Aside from those guys, we don't really have anyone who deserves to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 I thought Osi and Strahan both deserved to be there. Snee deserves it too... and I haven't looked at the Pro Bowl list but I'll just go ahead and GUESS that Davis from the Cowboys and that fat guy from the Eagles made it over him... cuz they are the "names." Aside from those guys, we don't really have anyone who deserves to go. I would say Tuck is another but he may be in it a few more years down the road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 I would say Tuck is another but he may be in it a few more years down the road Tuck didn't make the ballot, because he's technically not a starter. But he'll have his day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 2008 Pro Bowl starters Offense QB: Brett Favre, Tom Brady RB: Adrian Peterson, LaDainian Tomlinson FB: Tony Richardson, Lorenzo Neal WR: Larry Fitzgerald, Terrell Owens Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne TE: Jason Witten, Antonio Gates OT: Flozell Adams, Walter Jones Matt Light, Jason Peters OG: Leonard Davis, Steve Hutchinson Alan Faneca, Logan Mankins C: Andre Gurode, Jeff Saturday Defense DE: Aaron Kampman, Patrick Kerney Jared Allen, Kyle Vanden Bosch DT: Kevin Williams, Pat Williams A. Haynesworth, Vince Wilfork OLB: Julian Peterson, D. Ware James Harrison, Mike Vrabel ILB: Lofa Tatupu, DeMeco Ryans CB: Al Harris, Marcus Trufant Champ Bailey, Asante Samuel FS: Sean Taylor, Ed Reed SS: Darren Sharper, Bob Sanders Special teams P: Andy Lee, Shane Lechler K: Nicholas Folk, Rob Bironas KR: Devin Hester, Josh Cribbs ST: B. Ayanbadejo, Kassim Osgood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 Well considering we're on par with Oakland and Miami in the probowl dept. 9-5 isn't so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 One question....why is Taylor on the team? No disrespect or anything but really couldn't they have two other safetys and just hold a tribute to him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesta Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 One question....why is Taylor on the team? No disrespect or anything but really couldn't they have two other safetys and just hold a tribute to him? That would be the tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allstarjim Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 hahah funny, i see no Plaxico Burress...everyone was claiming he was a pro bowler... He was named a first alternate after playing almost the entire season with a nagging ankle injury. Fully healthy, he is probably the best WR in the NFC not named T.O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 The best part is the Roy Williams was leading the public vote, yet misses out! Shows how much the professionals think of this piece of shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 hahah funny, i see no Plaxico Burress...everyone was claiming he was a pro bowler... Couldn't resist, could ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 The best part is the Roy Williams was leading the public vote, yet misses out! Shows how much the professionals think of this piece of shit. Add to the fact that his partner in crime Ken Hamlin is going there as a reserve also. What the fuck is wrong with these voters? Ken Hamlin sucks giant donkey balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 Fred Robbins got robbed Pierce is not a pro bowler this year...hes not good for spags d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boohyah Posted December 19, 2007 Author Share Posted December 19, 2007 Fred Robbins got robbed Pierce is not a pro bowler this year...hes not good for spags d Robbins has only come on in the last few weeks, he doesn't deserve it. Especially with Tuck outplaying both him and Cofield in the same position and he's undersized for it in the first place. Robbins, IMO is a candidate to be released next season. I like him overall, but the Giants may feel they are set with Cofield/Alford and Tuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 He was named a first alternate after playing almost the entire season with a nagging ankle injury. Fully healthy, he is probably the best WR in the NFC not named T.O. Let's not get too carried away, Jim. Buress has been mediocre at best... 1 Randy Moss WR, NWE 87 1343 15.4 95.9 63 19 0 0 2 Terrell Owens WR, DAL 76 1307 17.2 93.4 52 14 0 0 3 Reggie Wayne WR, IND 82 1280 15.6 91.4 64 9 1 1 4 Chad Johnson WR, CIN 85 1265 14.9 90.4 56 6 2 1 5 B. Edwards WR, CLE 69 1170 17.0 83.6 78 13 3 2 6 L. Fitzgerald WR, ARI 83 1166 14.0 89.7 48 8 3 3 7 B. Marshall WR, DEN 86 1136 13.2 81.1 68 6 2 1 8 M. Colston WR, NOR 87 1092 12.6 78.0 45 9 1 1 9 Jason Witten TE, DAL 88 1068 12.1 76.3 53 7 1 1 10 Torry Holt WR, STL 83 1055 12.7 75.4 40 7 2 1 11 T. Houshmandzadeh WR, CIN 101 1028 10.2 73.4 42 11 2 1 12 Donald Driver WR, GNB 78 1016 13.0 72.6 47 2 1 0 13 Bobby Engram WR, SEA 85 1013 11.9 72.4 49 5 1 1 14 Wes Welker WR, NWE 96 1004 10.5 71.7 42 8 2 0 15 Roddy White WR, ATL 66 999 15.1 71.4 69 5 3 2 16 Joey Galloway WR, TAM 56 985 17.6 70.4 69 6 0 0 17 K. Winslow TE, CLE 71 971 13.7 69.4 49 5 2 1 Tony Gonzalez TE, KAN 82 971 11.8 69.4 31 5 0 0 19 Kevin Curtis WR, PHI 64 970 15.2 69.3 75 5 0 0 20 P. Burress WR, NYG 65 935 14.4 66.8 60 10 0 0 21 Derrick Mason WR, BAL 92 917 10.0 65.5 28 4 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 Couldn't resist, could ya? I don't blame him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 Let's not get too carried away, Jim. Buress has been mediocre at best... 1 Randy Moss WR, NWE 87 1343 15.4 95.9 63 19 0 0 2 Terrell Owens WR, DAL 76 1307 17.2 93.4 52 14 0 0 3 Reggie Wayne WR, IND 82 1280 15.6 91.4 64 9 1 1 4 Chad Johnson WR, CIN 85 1265 14.9 90.4 56 6 2 1 5 B. Edwards WR, CLE 69 1170 17.0 83.6 78 13 3 2 6 L. Fitzgerald WR, ARI 83 1166 14.0 89.7 48 8 3 3 7 B. Marshall WR, DEN 86 1136 13.2 81.1 68 6 2 1 8 M. Colston WR, NOR 87 1092 12.6 78.0 45 9 1 1 9 Jason Witten TE, DAL 88 1068 12.1 76.3 53 7 1 1 10 Torry Holt WR, STL 83 1055 12.7 75.4 40 7 2 1 11 T. Houshmandzadeh WR, CIN 101 1028 10.2 73.4 42 11 2 1 12 Donald Driver WR, GNB 78 1016 13.0 72.6 47 2 1 0 13 Bobby Engram WR, SEA 85 1013 11.9 72.4 49 5 1 1 14 Wes Welker WR, NWE 96 1004 10.5 71.7 42 8 2 0 15 Roddy White WR, ATL 66 999 15.1 71.4 69 5 3 2 16 Joey Galloway WR, TAM 56 985 17.6 70.4 69 6 0 0 17 K. Winslow TE, CLE 71 971 13.7 69.4 49 5 2 1 Tony Gonzalez TE, KAN 82 971 11.8 69.4 31 5 0 0 19 Kevin Curtis WR, PHI 64 970 15.2 69.3 75 5 0 0 20 P. Burress WR, NYG 65 935 14.4 66.8 60 10 0 0 21 Derrick Mason WR, BAL 92 917 10.0 65.5 28 4 0 Take away the injury that has clearly been limiting him, and you don't think he picks up a couple hundred more yards over the season? He already had more TDs than every one of your highlighted receivers except TO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Robbins has only come on in the last few weeks, he doesn't deserve it. Especially with Tuck outplaying both him and Cofield in the same position and he's undersized for it in the first place. Robbins, IMO is a candidate to be released next season. I like him overall, but the Giants may feel they are set with Cofield/Alford and Tuck. ya but Robbins is our only tru DT.. Tucks not a DT Alford needs time Joesph is a bust Coefield is mediocre DT/DE TYPE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boohyah Posted December 21, 2007 Author Share Posted December 21, 2007 ya but Robbins is our only tru DT.. Tucks not a DT Alford needs time Joesph is a bust Coefield is mediocre DT/DE TYPE You're right, but Robbins always seems to need to be motivated. Joseph is on IR and will probably be released anyway so i wasn't counting him. Alford needs time like you said but he's shown potential. Tuck will play DT because he can't get time with Stra and Osi and he plays well at DT. Cofield was mainly a run stuffer in college and I feel he's improving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Take away the injury that has clearly been limiting him, and you don't think he picks up a couple hundred more yards over the season? He already had more TDs than every one of your highlighted receivers except TO. Two things, Tree. I don't believe he's really injured. I believe he's exaggerating or faking an injury to avoid practice. And secondly, a TD is just another catch.. that happened to be in the End zone so I won't put too much stock into hom many TDs a Receive has... especially when he's towering over any defender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Two things, Tree. I don't believe he's really injured. I believe he's exaggerating or faking an injury to avoid practice. And secondly, a TD is just another catch.. that happened to be in the End zone so I won't put too much stock into hom many TDs a Receive has... especially when he's towering over any defender. Okay..so against the Eagles I guess you missed him limping after making a catch. But I guess you should be in the Giants training staff, what medical school did you go to again? MSU...make shit up university Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now