lemmiwinks Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 CB Nate Clements 6-0 209 27 years old 6 year nfl starter 23 int's 5 tds 432 tackels CB Asante Samuel 5-10 185 25 years old 4 year nfl starter 10 int's 2td 188 tackels Two Superbowl rings Pick your Player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Asante Samuel (I'm guessing) will come cheaper, and he just blanketed Marvin Harrison yesterday... AND showed up for a pick-6. He's the league's best kept secret. I wouldn't be unhappy with Nate, but seeing that he's a former 1st rounder (the same draft that we got the unstoppable Will Allen in), he'll probably have a bigger price tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Asante Samuel (I'm guessing) will come cheaper, and he just blanketed Marvin Harrison yesterday... AND showed up for a pick-6. He's the league's best kept secret. I wouldn't be unhappy with Nate, but seeing that he's a former 1st rounder (the same draft that we got the unstoppable Will Allen in), he'll probably have a bigger price tag. I'd prefer Samuel, but i think the 10 picks he had this year will make his price go up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I honestly wouldn't mind either, whoever comes cheapest. I like Samuel for his INTs and passes defended. On the other hand Clements has more tackles since 2003 and is 6' 0" and over 200lbs he can play with bigger recievers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feefifoefum Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Either one of these guys would be a considerable upgrade over our current CBs, but Samuel has really impressed me this postseason. He's a little younger, and probably will come cheaper, so he gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 It doesn't matter really...Either one of them is going to make me sell my soul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Samuel, but either one will make me a happy man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayD Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Either one of these guys would be a considerable upgrade over our current CBs, but Samuel has really impressed me this postseason. He's a little younger, and probably will come cheaper, so he gets my vote. A corner getting alot of tackles, may not be a good thing, if you dig what Im saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 A corner getting alot of tackles, may not be a good thing, if you dig what Im saying. I recall reading that Nate is great in run support so that would give him more tackles. But I know what you are saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShocker Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Anyone who doesn't say Samuel is nuts. I'm convinced he could be the best corner in the game right now, if not definitely top 3. The only guy who I've seen this year who comes close to him is Bailey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 I honestly wouldn't mind either, whoever comes cheapest. I like Samuel for his INTs and passes defended. On the other hand Clements has more tackles since 2003 and is 6' 0" and over 200lbs he can play with bigger recievers. How about we got BOTH? I mean that. Think about it. Our secondary sucks balls. If we're serious about fixing that, why not get BOTH guys. We're saving a ton of money from Barber's retirement, cutting that deadbeat linebacker Emmons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 I've bben saying Samuel for some time now, but I would be happy w/ Nate. JUST GET US A CORNER!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 I've bben saying Samuel for some time now, but I would be happy w/ Nate. JUST GET US A CORNER!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 I've bben saying Samuel for some time now, but I would be happy w/ Nate. JUST GET US A CORNER!!!! I agree I've bben saying Samuel for some time now, but I would be happy w/ Nate. JUST GET US A CORNER!!!! I said I AGREE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaginCaucasian Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 How about we got BOTH? Washington Foreskins strategy...... just sign every available big name free-agent? No thanks. J/K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now