Jump to content
SportsWrath

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do you think he's gonna decide this offseason? He says that he's gonna make a decision by March.

 

My guess is anything less than a SB victory and he plays one more season.

Posted

I see him coming back for one more year, SB win or not.

 

He is still a dominate force on the field and is a constant headache who commands double teams from O-lines. I think he comes back another year and rotates playing time with Tuck.

Posted

Semi-Off topic question: You think he gets into the HOF? My guess is hell yea, but you know it took them forever to put Harry Carson in. <_<

Posted
Semi-Off topic question: You think he gets into the HOF? My guess is hell yea, but you know it took them forever to put Harry Carson in. <_<

 

Yeah he gets in. He's one of the best DE to play the game and is liked by the media. I say he gets in the first year he is eligible.

Posted

Strahan will play another year at least and yes, I think he's a shoo in for the HOF. However the Giants will probably not retire his jersey knowing them.

Posted
Strahan will play another year at least and yes, I think he's a shoo in for the HOF. However the Giants will probably not retire his jersey knowing them.

If the Giants were to retire every great defensive players number the linebackers would have to start wearing letters instead.

Posted

I think Strahan comes back for another year, unless we by some miracle win the SB.

 

He's also a sure-fire HOFer, but I bet he's not first ballot due to anti-NY bias. :brooding:

Posted
If the Giants were to retire every great defensive players number the linebackers would have to start wearing letters instead.

I don't care if the number is retired or not, if I'm playing for the Giants, I don't take 53. I wouldn't take 92 either.

Posted
He is a two way DE in playing the pass and run equally well. Has the single season sack record and is a constant presence in the sports media; so I say yeah he is a first ballot shoo in.

Is that just normal analysis or did you include the "Anti-NY" bias?

Posted
Is that just normal analysis or did you include the "Anti-NY" bias?

Yeah I included the anti-NY bias...he is a good media quote machine and he is liked and well respected by most of his peers. All of the front offices would have sacrificed a rookie or two on the pyre back in his prime. So I do think he is a shoo-in :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...