JMFP Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Whoever comes closest without going over gets bragging rights. Let's give the GMB until 12 noon tomorrow (07/22/2008) to tally them up. Any threads created 07/20/2008 and older don't count. My Guess: 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Too conservative....I say 35. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 i need more specifics. must it have the name shockey in the title? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Nah, nah that is too narrow. How about #80; Reese is a moron....etc., Arm waving is me, broken legged sour puss; in a corporate box at the Super Bowl but still pissed off. The parameters must be as broad as is possible to encompass all that is Shockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boohyah Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Whoever comes closest without going over gets bragging rights. Let's give the GMB until 12 noon tomorrow (07/22/2008) to tally them up. Any threads created 07/20/2008 and older don't count. My Guess: 20. 59 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted July 21, 2008 Author Share Posted July 21, 2008 i need more specifics. must it have the name shockey in the title? It has to be self-evident as pertaining to Shockey or the Shockey trade: examples: "Good riddance" "What a dumb trade" "What a great move" "Reese screwed up" As a failsafe, look to the first post by the thread starter - if the title doesn't reference Shockey's name, but the post is about Shockey, it counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted July 21, 2008 Author Share Posted July 21, 2008 Nah, nah that is too narrow. How about #80; Reese is a moron....etc., Arm waving is me, broken legged sour puss; in a corporate box at the Super Bowl but still pissed off. The parameters must be as broad as is possible to encompass all that is Shockey. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 "Wider.....the parameters must WIDER....so that we can see the sun come out....." LOL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted July 21, 2008 Author Share Posted July 21, 2008 "Wider.....the parameters must WIDER....so that we can see the sun come out....." LOL!!! If Shockey is in the topic title, or mentioned inside the initial first post, then it counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Good....goooooooodd.....heh, heh....now we're talking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 I say, if you mean ANY thread invloving this Shockey trade, my guess is 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 10023482 saying we should of kept him 19283822 saying good riddance 1838472723 saying we trade Eli for Antonio Gates and 1 wishing "Tiki bear" would come back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 10023482 saying we should of kept him 19283822 saying good riddance 1838472723 saying we trade Eli for Antonio Gates and 1 wishing "Tiki bear" would come back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 I haven't been to the NYG board in a while...I take it that ADD still rules the day there. C. Wagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 11 And the new saying is "It is what it is" Shockey is GONE, let's move on! Good luck to Shockey and good luck to my Giants for 2008-2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Nothing but a pure Shockey board will satisfy my hunger for ALL THINGS....SHOCKEY!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 April 11, 2008 Shockey's status unclear as locker room opens to media...If the offer is good enough, who knows? Maybe they’d strike a deal. But Shockey is 27, coming off a broken leg, and has yet to make it through a full, 16-game season in his six-year career.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Too conservative....I say 35. 36 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 It has to be self-evident as pertaining to Shockey or the Shockey trade: examples: "Good riddance" "What a dumb trade" "What a great move" "Reese screwed up" As a failsafe, look to the first post by the thread starter - if the title doesn't reference Shockey's name, but the post is about Shockey, it counts. "Eli's a bust" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishgutmartyr Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 What is the over/under on the number of posts in each thread? I'm saying 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 36 LOL!!! Been watching too many episodes of the Price is Right....ha, ha, ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 LOL!!! Been watching too many episodes of the Price is Right....ha, ha, ha. ACtually I was thinking of an episode of Family Guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 ACtually I was thinking of an episode of Family Guy. Even better...lol. The threads of Shockey will become so numerous that they will form a singularity and all matter will be sucked down into it and transformed into pure energy.....only to emerge half a universe away through a white hole (not Shockey ) that will be the wonder of alien astronomers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Just so long as it does not emerge in the 42nd Universe I will be happy. Or 47th if you are a Trekkie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 The "Shockey Threads" will be such in abundance, it'll have the power to open up gateways to other worlds (to cross into our world). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now