Oh yeah, I'm all for new wrinkles in the offense... but honestly... I'm just not a fan of taking out a QB and direct snapping the ball to a back, who's more likely to throw an INT than a TD. If you have a Kordell Stewart or Michael Vick and can pull off those kinds of formations, then you can make it work... but I think now that there's a year of film to study, you're going to see the demise of the Wildcat pretty quickly... at least the "slash" style of wildcat, I'd bet.
I love the idea that we're getting an H-back. We haven't had one since the days of Aaron Pierce... who always seemed to flash brilliance right before a big mistake, lol. But they can definitely be a versatile player... I remember seeing Pierce run the ball on a sweep down by the goal line in the Dan Reeves days... but sometimes they'd split him out wide, use him as a lead blocker, or keep him in close to the line to block. THAT kind of versatility is cool... but let the QB stick to throwing the bulk of the passes.
And I've been pounding the "power back" drum for a good five years now, too. As defenses get smaller and quicker, you beat them not with speed... but by hitting them in the mouth. And then hit them in the mouth again... and then for variety, hit them in the mouth again. :deadhorse:
Then once they're down, unleash the Ahmad Bradshaws and Sinorice Mosses on 'em.