CrazedDogs

yeah, some of those teams are still going to turn over a quarter of their roster, maybe more.

damn it, quit jinxing it! Every time I've ever thought they had an easy schedule, all those crappy teams turned it around.

definitely Mayock. Kiper is a walking illustration for a d-bag.

lol, hard to get injured when you're drunk.

My resume is better. .... .... I'm fucking indestructible. ::flexes::

me too. It was like.... football in April. All day Saturday, all day Sunday, man, it was great... well, really it was better than nothing.

Yeah, five lousy gunners... that cupboard was bare, so IMO, thats the most valuable thing Harris brings to the table. It is alarming that Beasley beat him out, but that isn't a bad player either. Lots of good offensive players down in Dallas, and only one football to go around.

You posted the article I was referring to, didn't you even read it? The author only stacked the signing up relative to other kick returners. It was terrible analysis. It may or may not be a good signing relative to the contract value, but over and over again I see writers and folks on this board who seem to be drawing their conclusions based on very, very flawed logic.

When it comes to Harris, we've seen some very, very lazy analysis from the media (the nj.com article posted above being a perfect example).

Harris is just a punt returner? You sure about that?

not sure if serious... but if the Giants move to a 3-4, I expect you'd still see JPP at defensive end. He's playing at about 290 pounds, no way could he jump outside to linebacker.

Any sense of where he's projected to be drafted?

hey!....I'm going to a preseason game!

he wasn't bad in 2014.... his best season by far, IMO.

Read some good things on Hundley too, there are some who think he'll end up as the best QB in this class. And 100% agreed that the entire draft should be governed by BPA. If you're filling gaps in the roster via the draft, your team is screwed before the season even starts. Get mid-level free agents for gaps in the roster, and pick the best available prospects almost without regard to position in the draft.

yes, but just for marijuana. I wouldn't consider, for example, a crackhead, regardless of the round. A pothead though?... for a player of that talent, I wouldn't worry about it. Let the man have his grass, he isn't hurting anybody else.

ah, now if Leonard Williams comes down with a case of the munchies.... is he worth 9th overall? I'd have to guess yes....

I really wish I had time to watch more college football, I love to get into these discussions but, at least with respect to individual players, I just don't know enough to have an opinion worth a damn. From what I've read about who the players compare to, I do not like any of the projected first round wide receivers except for Cooper, and I think 9th overall would be too high for him. I'll be very disappointed if the Giants go WR at #9, especially if they go for one of the workout warriors who under-produced in college. (I had similar concerns when OBJ was drafted, so that shows what I know...) Looks like a good draft for defensive line talent, and I'm seeing lots of mocks in which weaker 'skill' position talent is pushing top defensive prospects a few spots down... that can only be a good thing for us. Not only can you never have too many pass rushers, but you can never have too much talent on the defensive line, period. But if only it was the offensive line draft that was deep.... I disagree that the offensive line is okay and it was just banged up last year. Hope I'm wrong about that, but I was very concerned by what I saw last season from even the healthy players (except for Beatty, who had a pretty good season). If by some miracle the Canadian import is at least an average NFL starter, maybe a high draft pick on the OL would be unnecessary, but I don't want to take that gamble. My philosophy is that the most important position on the offense is the offensive line, and I just don't see a group here that is good enough. They were only marginally acceptable in 2011, it took heroic QB play to win that Lombardi, and have been in steady decline since.

True. The guys that go in the first round despite drug use issues are the likes of Randy Moss, Warren Sapp, and Dan Marino. I have seen literally nothing of the guy so I have no clue how good he is, but it seems incredibly unlikely that he'd be worth the 9th overall pick.

Me? Never!

And that makes sense. I'm not saying that this isn't a red flag, just that its not fair to the individual or smart from a talent evaluation perspective, to use it as an artificial red flag for completely unrelated issues. We all know there are great NFL players who are pot heads. Most of them just get their shit together to piss clean. Personally, I'm perfectly fine with having one of those latter guys on the team. From what I've read about Gregory's talent, I'd take him too at the right draft position.

okay, I'm with you guys on the stupidity of not getting themselves ready to pee clean for this biggest, most important day of their lives. But can we at least be real about what it says about a guy? I've seen this line of criticism a few times now, that a guy who doesn't pee clean at the combine shows that he is the kind of guy who 'puts himself ahead of the team'.... but....HE ISN'T EVEN ON A GODDAMN TEAM. Does it show he isn't very bright? Possibly. Does it show he has impulse control problems? Almost definitely. Is it evidence of a team-wrecking narcissism? Hell no.

sounds like a good mid-round pick, Bleedin. I'm not thrilled with the idea of another wide receiver in the first round, not with so many other needs on the team. I'm really hoping the BPA is some big, mean MFer, offense or defense doesn't even matter, because this team just needs some big, mean MFers.

LOL, freudian typo?

well, Pugh didn't show very well in 2014... and Beatty has had seasons like that too.