bluebloodinflorida Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 If we do end up with Arrington, should we trade up for Santonio Holmes or Chad Jackson? Possibly a DT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hey Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Not for a reciever. Maybe a DT but it would cost us our 3rd rounder at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizan Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 For me the only player I would even think about trading up for is Bunkley. I would rather sit or trade back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 If we do end up with Arrington, should we trade up for Santonio Holmes or Chad Jackson? Possibly a DT? Why do people think we need to draft a WR in the first round...We have 6 WR on the roster, we don't need to waste our first round draft pick on another one. Haloti Ngata and Marcus McNeill are the only 2 players worth drafting in this years draft. IMO...I could less about anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 For me the only player I would even think about trading up for is Bunkley. I would rather sit or trade back. My thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 Why do people think we need to draft a WR in the first round...We have 6 WR on the roster, we don't need to waste our first round draft pick on another one. Because, with the exception of Toomer, not a one of 'em can catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 20, 2006 Share Posted April 20, 2006 those wr's are not worth trading up for it would have to be Ngata Bunkley and i might consider a CB but i do not see a big drop off from the #1 ranked cb to the 3rd or 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 If anything I say trade down and pick up addition picks in the second and third rounds as the Broncos did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 I'd trade up for Ngata and no one else. I hate the idea of trading up. I'd much, much rather trade down, especially in a draft as deep as this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Ravens | Team would like to acquire more picks Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:48:07 -0700 Jamison Hensley, of the Baltimore Sun, reports the Balitmore Ravens are clearly prepared to move down from the 13th spot in the first round of the NFL Draft to acquire more picks. Director of college scouting Eric DeCosta did little to hide his displeasure over the Ravens having two picks on the first day of a deep draft. "I wish I had six," he said. If the Ravens drop from the 13th pick to somewhere in the low 20s, they probably would receive an additional third-round pick. General manager Ozzie Newsome even said the Ravens could be enticed to give up the No. 13 pick before they are on the clock. According to a league source, the Ravens' two most coveted players are Texas DB Michael Huff and Texas QB Vince Young, but neither is expected to slip past the top 10. Unlike any other draft, this one will be unusual for the Ravens because they must pick immediately after the Cleveland Browns and their general manager Phil Savage, who ran the Ravens' college scouting department for nine years. "I would love nothing better than to jump up over (Savage) and pick his pocket," DeCosta said Could Ngata or Bunkley be there at 13? I'd pull the trigger on it. Since all they want is a our 1st and 3rd round picks. Then draft a linebacker in the second. After that simply BPA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Could Ngata or Bunkley be there at 13? I'd pull the trigger on it. Since all they want is a our 1st and 3rd round picks. Then draft a linebacker in the second. After that simply BPA... I can't say that I'd be completely against this as long as we didn't pull the trigger until draft day. I'd hate to go through with the trade now and then not have the guy we're targeting there to pick. We could easily write it up so that we have first dibs on a trade of picks (so as to avoid any other team trading with Baltimore before us) and that the trade only goes through if player A or player B are still available. A 3rd rounder to jump up 12 spots, that doesn't seem right, but then again, that's what the article said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relyoneli Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 Whatever it takes to get the best DT or LB available. Definitely not a wide receiver in the first round. That can be done later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 After signing Arrington...I would be all for trading up so we can get Bunkley or Ngata. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Could Ngata or Bunkley be there at 13? I'd pull the trigger on it. Since all they want is a our 1st and 3rd round picks. Then draft a linebacker in the second. After that simply BPA... One of them could be and I'd love to trade up for that. Just make sure we keep next year's first rounder and I'd be willing to give other things up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now