Lughead Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/giants/2010/12/02/2010-12-02_smith_diehl_may_play.html?r=sports%2Ffootball%2Fgiants&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nydnrss%2Fsports%2Ffootball%2Fgiants+%28Sports%2FFootball%2FGiants%29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 IMHO I think they should just rest them so they will be 100% for the home stretch. The Redskins are a division team but the Giants should handle them and their bad D. Also what's with Shanahan having bad Ds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 I agree, lets have them healthy for the stretch, beginning w/ Philly. Nicks should be comin back then too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jranieli Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 But no one should take this game for granted. Washington is a tough team and a divisional game. We need these two back as soon as possible. Hope Smith returns the following week for Minnesota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 I say suit them up but hold them out of the game unless its critical...the Giants have a history of rushing guys back and then fucking them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 But no one should take this game for granted. Washington is a tough team and a divisional game. We need these two back as soon as possible. Hope Smith returns the following week for Minnesota. Exactly. Every win from here on out is needed. 12-4 would be awesome. You can't 'rest' players when you aren't even close to having a playoff position, yet. You need everyone on the field that you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 If an injured player feels ready to play then put them in. At the first showing they can't perform 100% sit them down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 If an injured player feels ready to play then put them in. At the first showing they can't perform 100% sit them down. I'll take that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 If an injured player feels ready to play then put them in. At the first showing they can't perform 100% sit them down. Thank you mr obvious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 If an injured player feels ready to play then put them in. At the first showing they can't perform 100% sit them down. who are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 who are you? The she-male version of Lubeck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 The she-male version of Lubeck. So she finally came out after all these year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 So she finally came out after all these year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 trying to hide that adam's apple ha? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 trying to hide that adam's apple ha? What in the world started this line of discussion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 Nas' picture of that....that...thing above his signature line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 Nas' picture of that....that...thing above his signature line. I'm confused how "stating the obvious" turns me into a She-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 I'm confused how "stating the obvious" turns me into a She-Man I dunno.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 I'm confused how "stating the obvious" turns me into a She-Man Lighten up Sharon... I'm just busting your chops. It started when I was looking for a "Mr Obvious" image on google... somehow Dennis Rodman (if that's him) was one of the images.. I couldn't resist. And that's how the story of you being Sassy Sarah the sequel started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 Lighten up Sharon... I'm just busting your chops. It started when I was looking for a "Mr Obvious" image on google... somehow Dennis Rodman (if that's him) was one of the images.. I couldn't resist. And that's how the story of you being Sassy Sarah the sequel started. Ohhhhhh....that is a really weird picture to be connected to Mr. Obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 Ohhhhhh....that is a really weird picture to be connected to Mr. Obvious. it is.. blame google. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 it is.. blame google. Just another reason to be wary of Google. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 What in the world started this line of discussion? Did you not see blunatic ask you a couple of times who you were because you changed your name? Nas said the shemale version of lubeck, and Nem answered with what he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted December 5, 2010 Share Posted December 5, 2010 Did you not see blunatic ask you a couple of times who you were because you changed your name? Nas said the shemale version of lubeck, and Nem answered with what he said. I saw the one well after the She-male thing started and didn't bother replying cause all I did was change my name....Family Guy Higgins not changing was evident enough who I was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted December 5, 2010 Share Posted December 5, 2010 I saw the one well after the She-male thing started and didn't bother replying cause all I did was change my name....Family Guy Higgins not changing was evident enough who I was Isn't Liz Cheney lesbian? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now