BronxRik

#3 and 41 are wayyyyyy better than #4. Here's the full list and a link to prove it. Linky

As painful as it was to watch the first time, I watched it again. If only the holder would have grounded the ball when the snap was muffed, they would have had another shot at it. Oh well.

Giants.com has a Yankees section?

How 'bout this? TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........vTWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........TWEET......False start, #77, offence, 5 yard penalty, still 1st down........ I love the guy, love O-line continuity, but.......could the above have ANYTHING to do with being cut???

No need to apologize, most of my moves are actually vagina-like. But please, feel free to carry on the vagina-fest with whoever else you like.

What was a pussy move? Admitting I mistakenly thought Go_Eli was one of the other 'Eli' names? I made a post I probably shouldn't have made regardless of who I thought it was. My 'apology' was basically to Nem anyway, who I was calling out for giving the guy a 'pass'. I should have kept my comments to a PM.

I understand what both you and VG are saying. Read between the lines.....I UNDERSTAND. But once again, one post does not constitute trolling. That doesn't mean we won't keep an eye on things, Blu.

I'm confused.......who's a pussy?

I am sure if someone from here who frequents that site posted something they found interesting on SW, it probably wouldn't be an issue. If said member posted 100 links back to SW, yeah, I'm sure it would be an issue.

No, you da man, Nesta.

What if a different member was browsing that site, and posted a link? Would that be advertising as well? I see your point, honestly I do, but for the moment it's nothing more than a member posting a link to a Giants related article.

I agree with you, but one article doesn't equate to trolling. People link articles/interviews from all over the web, we don't have a problem with that. As far as Gregg goes, his site was his ONLY source of info, and it was blatant trolling.

Actually, you're right, and I am a chief offender. I recind my 1st post (I could just edit/delete it, but that would be kind of cowardly), as I mistook Go_Eli for one of the other 'Eli' names. And in reality, I was taking a cheap shot at Nem, but as I said, I had the wrong poster. I apologize, I was wrong. Members link Giants.com, BBI, and every other resource found on the web, linking to the original interview is no big deal, and shouldn't be. And our own 'rules of engagement' say members can advertise in their sig's, so there is no issue with that either.

Nem, bro, I love you but you've got to be kidding me, right? This was one of the members calling for the Fab 4 to be banned, and was thought to be one of the 'elite' posters, and is now advertising for another board...and you're effectively kissing his ass???? Give me a break. Certainly people are free to link references all over the web, but we all know what is really going on here, not all of us failed message board 101, as some might think.

C'mon now....YOU are much more entertaining after the Gmen blow the first series: Game announcer: "The Giants have certainly come out cold to start the game. 3 pass attempts and a predictable run on 3rd and 24...this could be a long day for the Gmen". SoCal: "FUCK!!! THIS TEAM SUCKS!!!! COUGHLIN SUCKS!!!! FIRE (Insert staff member here) NOW!!!!!!!!!! DO IT, GET IT DONE, OUR SEASON IS OVER!!!!!! Meanwhile, midway thru the 3rd qtr: Game announcer: "The Giants have certainly warmed up after a slow start. Eli is 25 of 29 and 3 TD's, and Jacobs has one of his own. Special teams has completely stopped any advancement and left the opposition no further than their own 30 all day". SoCal: "This is the best team EVER assembled. I knew all along we could pull this one off, good job Gmen".

Leach is out of the picture. Texans Match Offer for Leach

Why is everyone so hopped up on who we have or haven't signed? Or how mediocre the free agent talent is this year? Or 'why didn't we get him first'? The Eagles were going to sign a WR regardless after losing Stallworth. The significance of this signing is that a division rival now has a WR that potentially will burn the Giants secondary. "Good move for the Eagles, bad news for us".....absolutely, but not because the Giants didn't get him first, but because they got a player who will produce for them for at least 2 games in '07.

Yup.......Curtis against our secondary is definately bad news for us, no argument there.

Why not fill the WR hole made by Carter's departure with Walker? I mean, the argument seems to be that he is fast, and has hands, but can't cover, and commits too many penalties. If he's going to get cut/traded anyway, why not fill a hole from within?

It's GERRIS WILKINSON #59 . I thought it was WilkERson as well, but (not surprisingly), I am wrong.

We'll draft the next Jerry Rice in the 5th round this year. Unfortunately, he won't be recognized as the next Jerry Rice until we trade him in 2 years, ironically, to the 49'ers.

That's what you get for talking out of your ass. :::::chirp::::::: ::::::::chirp::::::::

I know breaking the bank this free agency is crazy, but I found this little tidbit from that link interesting: I've suspected the same thing since mid-January, in this post: And this one as well: While the market prices are insane, I cannot believe that if it were not for Coughlin being the HC, we would have signed someone, anyone at this point in time. It sure looks like Reese is setting up Coughlin to fail.

Reese is waiting for the Briggs situation to become T.O.-esque. He will then draft 2 players in the 2nd and 3rd rounds that Chicago like, and trade those players and next year's 3rd for Briggs. All the restructuring is in anticipation of having to pay Briggs big money once the trade is done. Watch.

Nothing to write home about, but it got the job done. Crap, yes. Fruity, no. Maraschino cherries no less. Geez, I make one post with a few mistakes in it, and everyone thinks I'm drunk, what the hell?