Jump to content


Photo

Cowboys in 2012


  • Please log in to reply
355 replies to this topic

#51 Drizzle

Drizzle

    Middle Name: Theman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,411 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Haggard Ass Backwoods, NY

Posted 12 June 2011 - 02:36 AM

86? Really? I thought we were discussing the present?

Dallas, Cleveland, San Fransisco, Oakland...great company you're in there.


Buffalo, Detroit. It's pretty funny how long it has been since the Cowboys were relevant....

#52 Tree

Tree

    International Gunslinger of Science

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,066 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canuckistan

Posted 12 June 2011 - 02:49 AM

Buffalo, Detroit. It's pretty funny how long it has been since the Cowboys were relevant....

I was specifically talking about teams who's TE was the leading receiver last season.

#53 Drizzle

Drizzle

    Middle Name: Theman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,411 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Haggard Ass Backwoods, NY

Posted 12 June 2011 - 02:55 AM

I was specifically talking about teams who's TE was the leading receiver last season.


Aw man, I thought you were talking about teams with SB droughts :(

#54 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:02 AM

86? Really? I thought we were discussing the present?

Dallas, Cleveland, San Fransisco, Oakland...great company you're in there.



haha you been hitting the wine too

I used your team as an example, because it's your team. :facepalm: Not cause it's the last time a team was successful when a te lead in catches.
You can look that shit up yourself gunslinger.

You haven't been a fan long have you, I mean you were totally clueless that your team won a sb and a te lead in recs.
too much gunslinger.

Of the teams you listed, all but cleveland's te would be an upgrade over boss.

#55 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:10 AM

If '07 was a fluke, at least Giants fans have a fluke season to reflect on in the last, what, working on 20 years? Goff is serviceable, obviously that is a position that can be upgraded, but Goff is fine at mlb.

The Giants as a whole are closer to winning the super bowl than the Cowboys.


Nothing wrong with that. A fluke sb victory is better than a fluke fumbled snap on a game winning fg in the playoffs.


And yet there was not one "Giants in 2012" thread when I got here. Not only that but the fans here are overly sensitive, as if they're riding a long long losing streak. How do you see the East playing out next year?

#56 boohyah

boohyah

    I have blah blah insurance so person come help!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,642 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:20 AM

I just signed up as "Jiantz" over on the Cowboys board, However I couldn't think of a stupid name for a topic.

#57 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:23 AM

I just signed up as "Jiantz" over on the Cowboys board, However I couldn't think of a stupid name for a topic.


Mite I suggest 'jintz in 2012' and may my brethren be more welcoming than yours have been.

#58 JM4P

JM4P

    Sugar Pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,403 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Uranus

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:23 AM

Welcome to Sportswrath, Cowboyz.

#59 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:25 AM

thank u joe.

#60 BronxRik

BronxRik

    ♥ ♣ ♦ ♠

  • Moderator
  • 23,249 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lost Wages, NV

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:31 AM

Mite I suggest 'jintz in 2012' and may my brethren be more welcoming than yours have been.


Booh has no brethren.


His mom on the other hand...............

#61 Drizzle

Drizzle

    Middle Name: Theman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,411 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Haggard Ass Backwoods, NY

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:38 AM

Nothing wrong with that. A fluke sb victory is better than a fluke fumbled snap on a game winning fg in the playoffs.


And yet there was not one "Giants in 2012" thread when I got here. Not only that but the fans here are overly sensitive, as if they're riding a long long losing streak. How do you see the East playing out next year?


I think as Giants fans, we're all naturally pessimistic. It helps when we're handed a defeat from the claws of victory (or however that goes) in the waning seconds of the 4th quarter in the most astonishing and disappointing way possible, year after year.

#62 boohyah

boohyah

    I have blah blah insurance so person come help!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,642 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:47 AM

Booh has no brethren.


His mom on the other hand...............


This shitz uncalled for, fuck you azzhole.

#63 boohyah

boohyah

    I have blah blah insurance so person come help!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,642 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:48 AM

Mite I suggest 'jintz in 2012' and may my brethren be more welcoming than yours have been.


Thank you for the advize.

#64 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:50 AM

Thank you for the advize.


yah welcome

#65 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:53 AM

I think as Giants fans, we're all naturally pessimistic. It helps when we're handed a defeat from the claws of victory (or however that goes) in the waning seconds of the 4th quarter in the most astonishing and disappointing way possible, year after year.


yea i think i've had a little more heartache than u the last 10 years.

#66 boohyah

boohyah

    I have blah blah insurance so person come help!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,642 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 04:03 AM

yea i think i've had a little more heartache than u the last 10 years.


Well Jerry did build you a new stadium to hold all that additional heartache.

#67 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 04:07 AM

Well Jerry did build you a new stadium to hold all that additional heartache.


don't yah be jealous now.

#68 BronxRik

BronxRik

    ♥ ♣ ♦ ♠

  • Moderator
  • 23,249 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lost Wages, NV

Posted 12 June 2011 - 05:18 AM

This shitz uncalled for, fuck you azzhole.


Youz right, Boohz. I'z iz wrong. I apologize. Friendz? :030:

#69 fringe

fringe

    Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,557 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 June 2011 - 05:22 AM

LOLz

#70 BronxRik

BronxRik

    ♥ ♣ ♦ ♠

  • Moderator
  • 23,249 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lost Wages, NV

Posted 12 June 2011 - 06:11 AM

:yawn: ZZZzzzzzzzzz.

#71 Virginia Giant

Virginia Giant

    Real Virginian

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,555 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Wilderness of Virginia

Posted 12 June 2011 - 02:56 PM

Nothing wrong with that. A fluke sb victory is better than a fluke fumbled snap on a game winning fg in the playoffs.


And yet there was not one "Giants in 2012" thread when I got here. Not only that but the fans here are overly sensitive, as if they're riding a long long losing streak. How do you see the East playing out next year?

I don't think we're sensitive, this place has a long and distinguished history of trolls, not fans of opposing teams mind you, but true trolls. The sportswrath defense mechanism kicks in whenever someone new shows up, especially when they are Cowboys or Eagles fans.


As far as the East is concerned, I don't see the Giants turning the ball over like they did last year, they or the Eagles will win the East with the Cowboys winning 9 games and the skins bringing in the rear.

#72 bigblue25

bigblue25

    PlayMaker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,305 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:18 PM

86? Really? I thought we were discussing the present?

Dallas, Cleveland, San Fransisco, Oakland...great company you're in there.


Witten lead Dallas in 2007, when they were 13-3. TE's don't normally lead the team in receptions, he didn't say they have too. TE's are also far from insignificant, unless your talking about Gilbride's offense. Winslow Jr, lead the Bucs in receptions and they were 10-6 last year. The Patriots had two rookie TE's catch 16 of their 37 receiving TD's.

#73 Tree

Tree

    International Gunslinger of Science

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,066 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canuckistan

Posted 12 June 2011 - 03:34 PM

haha you been hitting the wine too

I used your team as an example, because it's your team. :facepalm: Not cause it's the last time a team was successful when a te lead in catches.
You can look that shit up yourself gunslinger.

You haven't been a fan long have you, I mean you were totally clueless that your team won a sb and a te lead in recs.
too much gunslinger.

Of the teams you listed, all but cleveland's te would be an upgrade over boss.

Please, your think I didn't know who Mark Bavaro was? If you wanna feel welcomed here you might want to stop being a douche. How many other teams can you find the last 25 years that won the Big Dance with a TE as their leading receiver?

The 86' Giants were one of the most dominant defenses in league history. That's why they won, not because of an underachieving receiving corps. They also had a dominant RB. Your D doesn't even come close and your one example doesn't prove a trend. Go look up the win/loss records for the teams I listed, having a TE as your lead receiver is not a sign of a good team, it's a sign that you are relying on your safety valve too much.

You guys have a loaded backfield and Bryant may turn into a legit deep threat, he certainly has the physical tools, there's reason of optimism on your end but you need to sort your line out or Romo won't last much longer. Not in this division.

#74 fringe

fringe

    Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,557 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 June 2011 - 05:09 PM

Please, your think I didn't know who Mark Bavaro was? If you wanna feel welcomed here you might want to stop being a douche. How many other teams can you find the last 25 years that won the Big Dance with a TE as their leading receiver?

The 86' Giants were one of the most dominant defenses in league history. That's why they won, not because of an underachieving receiving corps. They also had a dominant RB. Your D doesn't even come close and your one example doesn't prove a trend. Go look up the win/loss records for the teams I listed, having a TE as your lead receiver is not a sign of a good team, it's a sign that you are relying on your safety valve too much.

You guys have a loaded backfield and Bryant may turn into a legit deep threat, he certainly has the physical tools, there's reason of optimism on your end but you need to sort your line out or Romo won't last much longer. Not in this division.


but but, i picked up Ron Gronkowski in my Fantasy Team "Nose Pickinz" and he got me solid points so you don't know shit!Posted Image

#75 Cowboyz

Cowboyz

    the flaccidator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2011 - 05:17 PM

I don't think we're sensitive, this place has a long and distinguished history of trolls, not fans of opposing teams mind you, but true trolls. The sportswrath defense mechanism kicks in whenever someone new shows up, especially when they are Cowboys or Eagles fans.


As far as the East is concerned, I don't see the Giants turning the ball over like they did last year, they or the Eagles will win the East with the Cowboys winning 9 games and the skins bringing in the rear.



ok i understand.
anything i say should be taken with a grain, i'm not a troll or anything

It really depends on when we can get started. But as it stands, Cowboys, gints, eags, skins.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users