JackStroud Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 This is what happens when you design an horse by committee....you get a Donkey Unremarkable, bland, and reliable The Giants and Jets should have built separate stadiums both domed.....not overspend on one huge architecturally bland edifice compared to the Cowboys stadium, the Lukas Field, etc.......this is a most forgettable edifice, rivaled by their former home in being functional and unremarkable contrasted by the job the Yankees and Mets did this one leaves me cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upstatefan Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 This is what happens when you design an horse by committee....you get a Donkey Unremarkable, bland, and reliable The Giants and Jets should have built separate stadiums both domed.....not overspend on one huge architecturally bland edifice compared to the Cowboys stadium, the Lukas Field, etc.......this is a most forgettable edifice, rivaled by their former home in being functional and unremarkable contrasted by the job the Yankees and Mets did this one leaves me cold fuck off Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I would like to see how the stadium looks at night.. I too think the architecture could've been better but it's nothing to bitch about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 This is what happens when you design an horse by committee....you get a Donkey Unremarkable, bland, and reliable The Giants and Jets should have built separate stadiums both domed.....not overspend on one huge architecturally bland edifice compared to the Cowboys stadium, the Lukas Field, etc.......this is a most forgettable edifice, rivaled by their former home in being functional and unremarkable contrasted by the job the Yankees and Mets did this one leaves me cold sorry you're cold jack- perhaps a cardigan would suit you. meantime, you can't compare baseball parks to football stadiums. That's why they don't make multi-functional arenas like they did in the 80's. You have that issue of people wanting to see the game from their $400 seats that gets in the way of making broad design strokes. now, the reason facelift stadium in dallas has that big screen is because you can't see the game otherwise from the cheap($300) seats. oh- and improved bathrooms is not a small thing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackStroud Posted April 11, 2010 Author Share Posted April 11, 2010 perhaps it will look better in person from the pictures it looks pretty vanilla, like it was designed by the port authority or something i like interesting architecture the new red bulls stadium, and citifield are winners yankee and X stadium seems bland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Pics and walkaround of new stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackStroud Posted April 12, 2010 Author Share Posted April 12, 2010 just looking at he way the lower seats take up so much acreage, it seems this stadium unlike Giants stadium was not designed for football..........when you pull away all the lower seats you have a general purpose events type seating the old stadium had a great close up view from every seat.......i guess they are relying on the video screens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 just looking at he way the lower seats take up so much acreage, it seems this stadium unlike Giants stadium was not designed for football..........when you pull away all the lower seats you have a general purpose events type seating the old stadium had a great close up view from every seat.......i guess they are relying on the video screens From that photo tour: "I got to view the field from all three levels of seating (the photo at the left is from the lower part of the upper deck). Honestly I don’t think there is a bad seat in the house. The seats seem to be a little closer to the field." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackStroud Posted April 12, 2010 Author Share Posted April 12, 2010 well the yankees won a championship there 1st yr in their new digs maybe we'll do the same.......the way the NFL changes year to year anything shy of the Lions winning would not suprise anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GorillaNJ Posted April 13, 2010 Share Posted April 13, 2010 perhaps it will look better in person from the pictures it looks pretty vanilla, like it was designed by the port authority or something i like interesting architecture the new red bulls stadium, and citifield are winners yankee and X stadium seems bland You are right... it does kiind of look like a bus terminal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted April 13, 2010 Share Posted April 13, 2010 it will probably take a couple years to develop some personality, really big football stadiums get their personality from the fans as opposed to architecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackStroud Posted April 13, 2010 Author Share Posted April 13, 2010 it will probably take a couple years to develop some personality, really big football stadiums get their personality from the fans as opposed to architecture. I take it back. It looks exactly like one of those outdooor whole house air conditioning units I suggest they get "York" to put their name on the building get it "York" ........ New york........despite the fact its in New Jersey Whatever, let Jerry have the hot stadium and hot women.......we'll just keep filling up the trophy case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted April 13, 2010 Share Posted April 13, 2010 I take it back. It looks exactly like one of those outdooor whole house air conditioning units I suggest they get "York" to put their name on the building get it "York" ........ New york........despite the fact its in New Jersey Whatever, let Jerry have the hot stadium and hot women.......we'll just keep filling up the trophy case. haha, it does kind of look like a central air unit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gspotter Posted April 13, 2010 Share Posted April 13, 2010 this building is just not aesthetically pleasing whatsoever. What a great opportunity to look amazing to be locationally branded and poof, it looks like a new stadium, not better, just the same. I think jerry jones' stadium is silly, but Indy's is something distinct. I had higher hopes and so we'll just have to hold our breath for another 30 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now