Cowboyz

remember the turnovers was your excuse for losing. i showed you, it's not the reason you lost in those games. the notion that those takeaways, most of which were fumbles, makes you a good defense is easily dismissed. instead of citing yards, sacks, and other meaningless numbers, where did you stand on scoring? middle of the road. even a dog's ass gets a little sunshine jim. especially vs the mediocre.

jimmy, if philly scores 9 points off of turnovers, and the giants score 7 off of turnovers. that's a net gain of 2 points off of turnovers for philly. they won by 10. do the math. fewell has always been good at creating turnovers vs lousy/mediocre qbs. that's what the tampa 2 does. look at the qb's you faced. it's certainly a unique list, and i doubt anyone in the league faced an easier group of qb's.

haha. youre running in circles jimmy. so your defense held after some turnovers, that doesn't dispute my point at all. it still fell on your defense to stop offensive drives. now it was all specials right? granted they did suck balls, but come on.

he's always had an issue, relative to the number of carries.

what is fallacious about turnovers not being the cause of your losses in those games you mentioned? you never commented on those numbers, and all you've got is 'I win". those numbers show the turnovers only netted 2, -4, and 3 pts in those games for your opponents. i think your emotions are gettin the best of you jimmy

if you say so jimmy, i'm still waiting for a retort to my last comments. well a retort that pertains to the comment anyway

my points are concise and easy to understand

so is the argument 'championship caliber' qb or is it franchise qb? you started out saying champ caliber. alex smith was a franchise qb at one time, so was ryan leaf. my argument is not that the qb position is unimportant, it's that it's not a necessity to have a championship caliber qb to go far in this league. youre trying to exaggerate my point. take your list and figure who on that list had a 'good defense' vs a bad one. i think you'll see another trend.

all coughlin did for tiki was change how he held the ball. one would think that would be a focus for every rb that comes to the team. and here you are again, wondering if bradshaw has a fumble problem. I'm thinking, if it could've been fixed, it would've been by now.

i said i'm a member, i didn't say i've been there a lot lately. listening to the same opinions over the off-offseason was getting tired. besides, i'm only on here about an hour a day total, unless of course i have to read one of jim's novellas.

fuck. figures. just got rid of it.

that's an easy one. you played very shitty competition. go back and see my post on the combined record of teams beaten by the gints.b it was not the turnovers, as i've just proven, it was the lack of defense. the only thing bitchslapped is that selective memory of yours. long-winded, superfluous, and muggy. that's your 'debate'.

i believe i just said basically the same thing about kitna. he could start half the teams, and he's no chump. no one said he's great. my point about the qb's stands. it's been proven over and over that a good defense, coaching, and ball protection will take you just as far as an elite qb. yes everyone goes on and on about how important the qb position is, but any fan worth his salt knows that qb's get too much credit for the wins, and too much blame for the losses. So you're saying McMahon was a 'championship caliber' qb? how did he do without that stout defense?

and your post sir, is long winded with very little meat. Philly game one: The eagles scored 9 points off turnovers. The gints scored 7. 2pt differential. That's your excuse? really? Philly game two: egals score 10 off TO's, gints 14. the punt return should've been irrellevant, if you played good defense. Tennessee scored 3 pts off turnovers. Your defense gave up two td drives and two fg drives (20 of 29 pts). if you want to let your defense off the hook, cause a one dimensional team got good field position, be my guest. and it looks like we're in agreement about the rest of the losses. like i said, weak defense.

funny how a moustache can make anyone look like a pornstar i agree boo, peyton on saturday nite live is one of the alltime best.

You'll resign Bradshaw, Smith, and Boss. Boss won't command much money. Blocking te's are a dime a dozen, and a te who avg's about 30 catches a year isn't going to score big in fa. Bradshaw can be explosive so he's hard to let go, his fumble problem may keep his price down enough to budget.

to me, tisch/mara are making a mistake here. just like jerry did when he didn't can wade's fat ass after '09. and then for coughlin to keep his staff intact?

youre a lil mixed up. the dog, in much better words than mine, explained exactly what i meant. thanks dog. you understood part of it, but evidently not all. we got beat by a lot of scrubs last year. during a complete implosion mind you. meanwhile, the gints were beaten by every winning team they faced, save the bears in learning mode.

i was looking at his profile and noticed under 'last activity' it said 'private', while mine gave the last date i was logged in. so i logged in anon and checked mine again. 'private'.

what are we talking here 2 weeks?

i was wrong. he didn't leave. he's just been lurking anonymously

so all of you thought a mlb was important before the draft, not so much when i point out the need for one. gotcha

yep you played them when they were still struggling to learn martz's offense, and they got us during an implosion who else you got? oh yeah that's it.

or who did better vs heavier competition that we both faced.

so if i go back and look at pre-draft threads here, there's gonna be no talk about drafting a linebacker early? i doubt it