Treehugger Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 A. Bradshaw - 5.8 ypc/1 TD on 10 carries + 61 yards receiving (2 receptions) A. Brown - 4.92 ypc/1 TD on 13 carries D. Wilson - 2.17 ypc on 6 carries + 5 yards receiving (1 reception) What a bum, bench his ass. He's our third best option right now. Why do the Giants keep showing loyalty to busted players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayD Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 I like Bradshaw alot. He had a great game last night. But I dont think those stats are a good reflection of the year he's had so far. He's had a serious problem with being consistant. In alot of games this year he stunk up the place, then padded his stats with one or 2 break out runs. But yea, he had a great game last night. That being said, I hope he can continue to play the way he did last night. Brown going down really sucks. The guy was money on short yards. Looks like Wilson is finnaly going to get some snaps. Hope he can replace Browns production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 I knew you'd beat me to the post. Bradshaw played very well last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allstarjim Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Said it before, Bradshaw is maybe the most competitive, fiery player we have on our whole team. That guy runs with so much desire it's ridiculous. The problem is not with his heart. It's with his body. He can't carry a 20 carry plus load week after week. If we manage him, and we get to the Super Bowl again, then sure, turn him loose. But until then, he needs help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Said it before, Bradshaw is maybe the most competitive, fiery player we have on our whole team. That guy runs with so much desire it's ridiculous. The problem is not with his heart. It's with his body. He can't carry a 20 carry plus load week after week. If we manage him, and we get to the Super Bowl again, then sure, turn him loose. But until then, he needs help. Right- he had a lot more energy this week, Like the beginning of the season. He needs a good supporting cast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted November 26, 2012 Author Share Posted November 26, 2012 He had nearly identical ypc this week (5.8) as he did in Week 10 (5.7). Is 0.1 ypc the difference between "benchworthy" and "energized"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 He had nearly identical ypc this week (5.8) as he did in Week 10 (5.7). Is 0.1 ypc the difference between "benchworthy" and "energized"? So you're saying he's good for over 20 touches a game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Given the injury to Brown, all my prior comments are hereby nullified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted November 26, 2012 Author Share Posted November 26, 2012 So you're saying he's good for over 20 touches a game? Where did I say that? I've previously stated I wanted to see all three RBs sharing the workload. My objection is to hyperbole; Bradshaw is serving his role within the TEAM very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted November 26, 2012 Author Share Posted November 26, 2012 Given the injury to Brown, all my prior comments are hereby nullified. Flip-flopper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Flip-flopper. I prefer "flexible". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Where did I say that? I've previously stated I wanted to see all three RBs sharing the workload. My objection is to hyperbole; Bradshaw is serving his role within the TEAM very well. That's why there was one of these (?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Where did I say that? I've previously stated I wanted to see all three RBs sharing the workload. My objection is to hyperbole; Bradshaw is serving his role within the TEAM very well. I honestly don't know where this message board would be without hyperbole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 I honestly don't know where this message board would be without hyperbole. Rational thinking is over rated. If the Giants lose to the Redskins we can start some truly inspirational doom talk again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now