osi724dasack Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 If we had Ngta on our d-line with Osi and Strahan...I think our d would be unstoppable. same with Bunkley so is it worth giving up some picks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_Grimes Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Depends on the price. A lot of mocks have those guys pretty high, I'm not sure its reachable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Take a linebacker because Arrington's knees give out by week 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nosebleed Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Take a linebacker because Arrington's knees give out by week 5. He will be playing catch on the sideline with Shockey, laughing, giggling, as Plax shakes his head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 we would have to move up to around 10-13 to get either of those guys... i am not sure the juice is worth the squeze although they are very good DT's i just wish there was a 3rd DT we could go after besides Gabe Watson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motes Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Depends how far they fall, but I won't be surprised at all to see EA pull the trigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiantDon Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 I don't think it would be very wise to move up to get DT because normally they need time to adjust. EA is retiring and he's gonna draft players who have immediate impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 If one of those guys get to 13, EA my try to pull the trigger. I don't see them falling past 13 though but I'm willing to slightly overpay to get to that slot where we can draft a DT that can put our d on another level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 If the Giants are looking for a 1-technique DT to replace Clancy, and they don't like Watson at 25, there are other options outside of trading up for Ngata. Keep their picks and take someone like Cofield, Le Kevin Smith, and Tommy Jackson in the mid rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 If the Giants are looking for a 1-technique DT to replace Clancy, and they don't like Watson at 25, there are other options outside of trading up for Ngata. Keep their picks and take someone like Cofield, Le Kevin Smith, and Tommy Jackson in the mid rounds. I would like us to take a look at Brenston Bukner if its doable? what kind of $ is he looking for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motes Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 I would like us to take a look at Brenston Bukner if its doable? what kind of $ is he looking for? Buckner is near finished. I'd give him nothing more than the minimum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizan Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 I posted this on another board I figured it would be good for here as well. This was in response to a clipping that the Browns are interested in trading down. We would most likely have to give our 1st, 2nd, and our 3rd to get to 12 overall. Not all draft pick value charts are the same but thats the general idea. 12= 1200 points 25= 750 points 56= 340 points 89= 145 points We would have the chance at getting Ngata or Bunkley with that 12th pick. If Ngata is available though the Browns wont be trading back. Savage said he would love to have Ngata and is very high on him. The Ravens said they would love to pick his pocket and move up and steal Ngata from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 24, 2006 Author Share Posted April 24, 2006 we would have to move up to around 10-13 to get either of those guys... i am not sure the juice is worth the squeze although they are very good DT's i just wish there was a 3rd DT we could go after besides Gabe Watson Claude Wroten is up to there talents...but Wroten has some big character issues, so that may be a concern. And I wouldnt take Watson if he was there in the 3rd round.... he lacks motive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUND Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Claude Wroten is up to there talents...but Wroten has some big character issues, so that may be a concern. And I wouldnt take Watson if he was there in the 3rd round.... he lacks motive I'm not high on Gabe Watson either but if he's there in the 2nd we HAVE to take him. 3rd round? Somebody went biking without their helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 24, 2006 Author Share Posted April 24, 2006 I'm not high on Gabe Watson either but if he's there in the 2nd we HAVE to take him. 3rd round? Somebody went biking without their helmet. I can really see Watson slipping far far down...maybe not into the 3rd, but the 2nd is very possible. He is very talented, but just doesnt give an effort. He may be this years Antaaj Hawthorne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 I can really see Watson slipping far far down...maybe not into the 3rd, but the 2nd is very possible. He is very talented, but just doesnt give an effort. He may be this years Antaaj Hawthorne Hawthorne was a vastly different case. He failed a drug test. If anyone will be this year's Hawthorne, it's Wroten... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 24, 2006 Author Share Posted April 24, 2006 Hawthorne was a vastly different case. He failed a drug test. If anyone will be this year's Hawthorne, it's Wroten... well you watch the Michigan games...what do you think of Watson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motes Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 From what I've read Watson's main concern is his motor. Would you agree Money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 24, 2006 Author Share Posted April 24, 2006 From what I've read Watson's main concern is his motor. Would you agree Money? its his effort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motes Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 its his effort That's what I said, "motor" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 24, 2006 Author Share Posted April 24, 2006 That's what I said, "motor" oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 From what I've read Watson's main concern is his motor. Would you agree Money? Absolutely. His endurance sucks because he struggles to stay in shape (which is why he was benched this past year). As a result, he tends to be lazy and take plays off. "Underachiever" is a term thrown around a lot, especially with regard to massive DTs, but it applies to Watson completely. If he's in shape and playing hard, he's a force. But he was rarely a force at UM, usually because of those two (related) factors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now