Jump to content


Photo

Pro Football Focus Top Ten Overrated Draft Prospects

Some guys weve discussed

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Herc

Herc

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,705 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2015 - 02:39 PM

Thursday, April 23, 2015
Most overrated NFL draft prospects

ESPN Insider

By Mike Renner
Pro Football Focus



  in_ncf_tripanel_jv_576x324.jpg

Every year, there are some players that fail to live up to their pre-draft hype. With Pro Football Focus now analyzing college games and producing performance stats based on every play, let's take a look at some of the players whose 2014 production doesn't match their draft stocks.

After compiling this list, it became obvious there was a theme in our selections. All the players included already look the part of a high-level NFL player in terms of size, speed, etc., but none performed even like high-level college players. If these guys can't consistently beat up on college opponents, what's going to change when they square off against NFL players that can match their athleticism?

While it's understandable that these players have first- or second-round grades based off of their potential, each provides teams considering selecting them early some cause for concern, because all are still a ways away from realizing that potential.

Click here for a list of the 10 most underrated prospects in this class.

1. Trae Waynes, CB, Michigan State

While most left the combine in awe of Waynes' speed, the discussion among PFF analysts centered on the fact that his 20-yard shuttle (4.39 seconds) was slower than his 40 time (4.31), a rare feat we couldn't recall seeing. That poor change-of-direction ability was evident on tape, and is a problem at a position where change of direction is vital.

Moreover, for someone who possessed the recovery speed to not have to worry about getting beat deep, Waynes was fairly average breaking on intermediate routes and had only three pass breakups on 59 targets. His mark for yards per coverage snap allowed was just about average, at 1.04, but he was exposed against the most talented passing team the Spartans faced all year (Oregon). In that game in Week 2, he yielded 113 yards on seven targets, including a touchdown.

2. Arik Armstead, DE, Oregon

It seems as though many look at Armstead's measurables (6-foot-7, 292 pounds, 5.1-second 40-yard dash) and his position (3-4 defensive end) and can't foresee him becoming anything other than Calais Campbell. What has gotten overlooked for the most part, however, is that Campbell had as many sacks his sophomore season of college (10.5) as Armstead had his entire Oregon career.

Defensive line is one of the positions where physical freaks can easily dominate in college with little to no technique. That is why it's concerning that Armstead produced well outside the upper echelon of defensive linemen. The Oregon defensive end graded out as our No. 20 interior linemen against power five schools, and posted middling numbers in run-stop percentage (7.1) and pass-rushing productivity (6.0) for the season. Those are worrisome numbers for a potential top-15 pick.

3. Brandon Scherff, OT, Iowa

This one comes with a caveat, as we think Scherff could possibly be a fantastic guard, it's just that if you plug him in at left tackle next season you'll be sorely disappointed. It's difficult to see the Outland Trophy winner ever being an effective pass protector on the edge. Scherff wasn't close to the top of our tackle rankings, even after facing a fairly weak slate of edge rushers in the Big Ten. The Iowa tackle's 96.2 pass-blocking efficiency was 62nd out of the 95 draft-eligible tackles.

People have fallen in love with Scherff's ability to plant a defender to the turf, but when asked to play in space on the edge, Scherff lacked the length and feet quickness to regularly engage defenders. His skill set translates much better to guard in the NFL, but even there he would be something of a question mark.

4. Bud Dupree, LB, Kentucky

  ncf_a_kentts_576x324.jpg

After one of the most impressive performances in the history of the combine and a productive senior season, it is easy to see why Dupree has become a consensus first-rounder among draft analysts. However, when we dug deeper into his stats and film, there were some red flags that popped up.

The most meaningful one is that only three of his 36 pressures came against tackles with positive pass-blocking grades for the season. While he posted an overall respectable pass-rushing productivity mark of 9.8, that number dropped to 7.1 against SEC competition. A third of those pressures against SEC competition came versus Missouri's right tackle, Taylor Chappell, who had the second-worst pass-blocking grade in the country.

It's also worth noting that despite being 6-foot-4, 269 pounds, Dupree didn't generate a single pressure off of a bull rush last season. Those stats paint the picture of a player who feasted on weak competition and then put up impressive workout numbers, rather than a complete pass-rusher.

5. Devin Funchess, WR/TE, Michigan

Funchess is a tweener who some project as a "move" tight end in the NFL. Our analysts saw a different story, as we thought he had neither the radical size advantage to out-muscle corners nor the quickness to consistently beat linebackers. To top it off, he showed very little promise as a run blocker.

This means Funchess is likely limited to a "big slot" role like Marques Colston. However, playing the slot requires a certain level of consistency that Funchess simply doesn't possess yet, and he'll have to improve in that area. The 6-foot-4, 232-pound receiver had an 8.8 percent drop rate (8.3 percent was the NCAA average) to go along with a handful of misses on attempted contested catches.

6. Eddie Goldman, DT, Florida State

Goldman has many of the traits you look for in a nose tackle at the NFL level. He holds up well versus double-teams and has the strength to control most one-on-one blocks. He was by no means special in that regard, however, and was fairly poor at shedding and making the stop himself. In fact, his 5.3 run-stop percentage was well below average for this class.

Run defense aside, if you are taking a nose tackle in the first round, he better provide some complementary pass-rushing ability, and Goldman did not last season. The Florida State defensive lineman finished with a 5.5 in pass-rushing productivity, a figure far less than half that of the leader among D-linemen, Stanford's Henry Anderson (12.1).

7. Phillip Dorsett, WR, Miami

  ncf_u_dorsett1x_576x324.jpg Phillip Dorsett stood out for his speed at the 2015 Senior Bowl.

Everyone loves speed at the receiver position because it is so hard to find, but consider the following: 38 receivers have run sub-4.4 40-yard dashes since the 2009 combine, and only six are now a top-two receiver on their respective teams. The main takeaway is that speed can help, but one needs to do so many other things well to be a complete receiver in the NFL.

With Dorsett, we didn't see much besides elite speed. He's undersized at 5-foot-10, 185 pounds, and is still an unrefined route runner. Of his 67 targets last season, 40 came on deep routes (go, deep crosser, post and corner). He'll have to run a much more varied route tree at the next level. DeSean Jackson goes deep as often as anyone in the NFL, and even he was only targeted on downfield routes 37 percent of the time last season.

There's certainly a lot of potential here, but with all the other proven talent at receiver in this draft, taking Dorsett in the first round would be a substantial gamble.

8. Shaq Thompson, S/LB, Washington

People have been in love with Thompson's athleticism since he was a five-star recruit coming out of high school in Sacramento. However, all the athleticism in the world won't make up for poor instincts as a linebacker, and Thompson has yet to show he can make the necessary reads for the position. His 7.3 run-stop percentage was 41st among 58 draft-eligible starting inside linebackers, and he was an overall ineffective player against the run, outside of forcing and recovering fumbles.

Thompson's skill set translates better to safety, as he was smooth in coverage and has nickelback experience, but it's hard to feel comfortable picking a player early for a position you've never seen him play.

9. P.J. Williams, CB, Florida State

After watching all of Williams' plays this season, our analysts agreed that the most accurate description of him is "inconsistent." Inconsistency at cornerback in the NFL is synonymous with getting benched, as defensive coordinators won't put up with the types of highs and lows Williams experienced last season.

While the Florida State corner was aggressive and productive around the line of scrimmage, he gave up tons of ground on intermediate and deep routes when receivers got a hint of initial space. Williams actually graded out negatively in coverage, in no small part due to his silly habit of not wrapping up receivers after the catch. He missed 11 tackles in coverage last season, and his ratio of a miss on every 6.2 attempts was 79th out of 101 starters in the class.

10. Benardrick McKinney, LB, Mississippi State

McKinney is a fantastic athlete whose size (6-foot-4, 246 pounds) and explosiveness (a 4.66 in the 40-yard dash, a 40.5-inch vertical leap) have him at or near the top of most inside linebacker rankings. The trouble is that all of our analysts who broke down his games agreed they wouldn't trust McKinney as anything more than a two-down linebacker. That still has value, but not early-round value.

McKinney's 0.81 yards per coverage snap was below the class average of 0.71, and he made a paltry five stops in coverage all season, 66th among inside linebackers (Eric Kendricks led, with 28). His biggest problem was bringing down receivers in space, as he had only seven solo tackles in coverage, compared to five missed tackles.



#2 BleedinBlue

BleedinBlue

    The Voice of Reason

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,281 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 23 April 2015 - 02:52 PM

I think Scherff will be a perennial pro-bowler. But the guy is right, it won't be as a tackle. He could wind up being the best guard taken in the past decade, but he's not going to be a tackle. He might be overrated as a tackle, but he's still a top tier player and that puts him in unique company.

I still think Bud Dupree and Arik Armstead are first round material, but not top ten material (the Gold Zone). They might be "overrated" but are still the best of the second tier (Silver), which ranks them in the top 40 players available, and likely in the top 20.

Interesting read.

#3 bigblue25

bigblue25

    PlayMaker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,309 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 23 April 2015 - 04:11 PM

Agreed on Waynes. I think Shane Ray should be on this list. Ray to me is overrated and Dupree is underrated

#4 BleedinBlue

BleedinBlue

    The Voice of Reason

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,281 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 23 April 2015 - 04:24 PM

Agreed on Waynes. I think Shane Ray should be on this list. Ray to me is overrated and Dupree is underrated


Ray announced he has to have (or might need) surgery on his foot or something like that. That will make his stock drop like a rock. If you don't need an edge rusher this season, he'd be a bargain for some team willing to wait a year or two before he's ready to start.

#5 JM4P

JM4P

    Sugar Pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,403 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Uranus

Posted 23 April 2015 - 04:42 PM

I think Scherff will be a perennial pro-bowler. But the guy is right, it won't be as a tackle. He could wind up being the best guard taken in the past decade, but he's not going to be a tackle. He might be overrated as a tackle, but he's still a top tier player and that puts him in unique company.

I still think Bud Dupree and Arik Armstead are first round material, but not top ten material (the Gold Zone). They might be "overrated" but are still the best of the second tier (Silver), which ranks them in the top 40 players available, and likely in the top 20.

Interesting read.

 

 

I think OL is a major priority, but with a top 10 pick you really need to get an impact player (i.e., best available).

 

I wanted Zach Martin, we got ODB....... I still like my choice of Martin, a tremendous player and a huge reason why the Cowboys made the playoffs.   I also think that ODB turned into a total home run for the Giants.

 

If we are talking tail end of the round, it's a little different.....but sitting where the Giants are, if they are married to a positional pick, they'd be better off trading down and generating additional picks.    I like Scherff alot, the question is whether he's truly a top 10 talent, and frankly, I'm not sure.

 

Is a left tackle worth a top 10 pick?.....yeah.    Is a guard worth a top 10 pick?..... :confused:



#6 BleedinBlue

BleedinBlue

    The Voice of Reason

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,281 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 23 April 2015 - 04:55 PM

I think OL is a major priority, but with a top 10 pick you really need to get an impact player (i.e., best available).
 
I wanted Zach Martin, we got ODB....... I still like my choice of Martin, a tremendous player and a huge reason why the Cowboys made the playoffs.   I also think that ODB turned into a total home run for the Giants.
 
If we are talking tail end of the round, it's a little different.....but sitting where the Giants are, if they are married to a positional pick, they'd be better off trading down and generating additional picks.    I like Scherff alot, the question is whether he's truly a top 10 talent, and frankly, I'm not sure.
 
Is a left tackle worth a top 10 pick?.....yeah.    Is a guard worth a top 10 pick?..... :confused:


We think exactly alike. I wanted Zack Martin so bad last year I nearly threw the remote when I heard we took a WR. And I hadn't studied WR's last year and knew very little about OBJ except that he was the 2nd rated WR in the draft. And in hind sight, we swung for the fences and connected (although after he was hurt and didn't practice or play in the first few games, I figured we blew it).

I literally yelled "shit" and was visibly upset when the Cowboys snagged Martin. Not picking him was upsetting as all get out, but watching him go to Jerry Jones' team was the straw that broke the camel's back.

And I like Scherff a lot as well - it's just that burning a no.9 pick on a guard seems so high...and I don't expect the Giants will get this high a pick again in many years (knock on wood). And WR's, CB's, scare the death out of me because they have such short careers and get hurt easily. So I want a big ass lineman whose a legitimate top 10 pick and will solidify the line for the next decade.

#7 CrazedDogs

CrazedDogs

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,478 posts

Posted 23 April 2015 - 05:58 PM

to pick a guard that high, he would have to be a hall of famer for it to not be a blown pick.



#8 Tempest

Tempest

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,752 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC

Posted 23 April 2015 - 06:03 PM

to pick a guard that high, he would have to be a hall of famer for it to not be a blown pick.

 

nonsense.  We just need a minimum ten year starter that takes a fatal weakness and turn it into a strength this season and not two-three years from now.



#9 CrazedDogs

CrazedDogs

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,478 posts

Posted 23 April 2015 - 06:29 PM

 

nonsense.  We just need a minimum ten year starter that takes a fatal weakness and turn it into a strength this season and not two-three years from now.

 

yeah, you're right, I'd like to walk that one back.

 

Would have been true back when top ten picks were getting several million $$$ per season on rookie contracts though.



#10 Pdouble

Pdouble

    The King

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,959 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate New York

Posted 23 April 2015 - 07:07 PM

Chris Mortensen @mortreport 51s52 seconds ago

Shane Ray says Dr. Aakash Shah told him he does not need surgery to fix toe. Ray says some teams want him to rehab properly in early OTAs

 

Chris Mortensen @mortreport 34s34 seconds ago

All teams have known about Ray's issue. Some team medcial staffs do believe surgery may be necessary, as @LanceZierlein said. Others say no






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users