Treehugger Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 no reason why they couldn't have a single tailback behind them or 6 linemen in front of them or both. 5 linemen + 1 TE + 2 QB + 3 RB/WR = 11 But the QB without the ball would be on blocking duty regardless. He's not just gonna get out of the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlb37 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 to bad we can't run out the group they announced as the "Starting Offense" last weekend before the game Line: Diehl, Seubert, O'Hara, Snee and McKenzie WR: Nicks, Manningham and Smith FB: Pascoe TE: Boss RB: Bradshaw and Jacobs QB: Eli now that is a set that would give defensive coordinators fits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Dallas can very well rebound.. the games they played so far are all tough games. It would be huge for us if we get out of Dallas with a W. Dallas is desperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 to bad we can't run out the group they announced as the "Starting Offense" last weekend before the game Line: Diehl, Seubert, O'Hara, Snee and McKenzie WR: Nicks, Manningham and Smith FB: Pascoe TE: Boss RB: Bradshaw and Jacobs QB: Eli now that is a set that would give defensive coordinators fits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 to bad we can't run out the group they announced as the "Starting Offense" last weekend before the game Line: Diehl, Seubert, O'Hara, Snee and McKenzie WR: Nicks, Manningham and Smith FB: Pascoe TE: Boss RB: Bradshaw and Jacobs QB: Eli now that is a set that would give defensive coordinators fits I'm laughing because Tree was laughing.. I kindda just got it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted October 26, 2010 Author Share Posted October 26, 2010 #1: Giants: they have a passing game, a 1-2 punch at running back, (OFFENSE NFL #5) an effective 4 man pass rush (DEFENSE NFL #1), and a secondary that I'm not worried about. Special teams suck ass, and sometimes they leave their brains in the locker room, but on paper, and on the field recently, they look to be the best team of the bunch. #2: Philly. Tremendous receivers. (OFFENSE NFL #8) Not sure about the defense (DEFENSE NFL #15) that almost folds in the face of Alex Smith and the 49ers. Bradley is not a dominant LB. Brewing QB controversy with Kolb winning now. The Fat Man can still coach, though. #3 Washington: Could flip with Philly for #2....very close. Great coach, but shoddy (DEFENSE NFL #32) defense.....other than McNabb, nothing too dangerous on offense (OFFENSE NFL #15) They have a sluggers chance to win the division, but going farther assumes McNabb is capable of doing something in the postseason, and his track record is mixed, at best. Shanahan needs one more year and another draft class before they are truly dangerous. #4 Dallas: Best team in the division if you don't count winning and losing. Their coach is a goofball, and their offensive line has serious issues. Offense is productive (OFFENSE NFL#2) Strong defense (DEFENSE NFL #8). QB has great stat lines but no accomplishments. UPDATE: No change.....other than some broken Romo bones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted October 26, 2010 Share Posted October 26, 2010 washington has a great coach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted October 26, 2010 Author Share Posted October 26, 2010 washington has a great coach? Two Super Bowl wins......yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted October 26, 2010 Share Posted October 26, 2010 Two Super Bowl wins......yes. granted- i just think he did nothing to get in Elway's way. what exactly is he great at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted October 26, 2010 Share Posted October 26, 2010 UPDATE: No change.....other than some broken Romo bones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now