nosebleedjints Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 They have poor depth at WR, and do not have or much youth there. If you combine Moss and his speed, with Shockey over the middle, you have a mis match nightmare. We have Shockey, so we don't need somebody who goes there, and with Shockey, we have versility. If a team has good lbs, we can gameplan to use 3 WRs more, if a team has poor lbs or good CBs, we cna use Shockey instead, and the best thing is, with Burres and Toomer, we can have Moss work the slot and be gradually fitted. I would like us to consider Ngata, Bunkley, Cromartie, along with Moss. We could offer Moss the best role, and it would further add intrigue playing Washington as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 if we take a WR we should trade up and take jackson!!man hes a beast! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Sinorice has two red flags. First, his size. Second, his production at Miami was unimpressive, especially against top opponents. Two red flags = not top 25 material. Nice pick at 56, though. We can get a better player at pick 25... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosebleedjints Posted April 23, 2006 Author Share Posted April 23, 2006 if we take a WR we should trade up and take jackson!!man hes a beast! Florida WR do not have a good track record, we need the picks we have, and Moss is a special mismatch player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Jackson is much better prospect than Moss. Bigger, faster, better hands, better production... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Jackson is much better prospect than Moss. Bigger, faster, better hands, better production... unbeliavable speed if he stayed in school he could have prolly ended up being a top 5 pick next year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest So.Cal Dub Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 I thought you said we should address the "RB situation"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parlintm Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Florida WR do not have a good track record, we need the picks we have, and Moss is a special mismatch player. If you're just looking for speed, take Devin Hester in the third. If you want a great RECEIVER trade up for Jackson. I think we address this somewhere in rounds 2-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motes Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Holmes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest So.Cal Dub Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Holmes Santonio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Money Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Holmes I think he and Jackson would be terrific choices at 25. Unfortunately, it looks like both will be off the board... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 If the Giants are foolish enough to draft Moss, they deserve the fate that befalls them as a result. He's nothing more than a punt returner in the NFL . . .if he has the cojones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Moss does not deserve the 25th pick i would actully much rather have DeAngelo Williams or Lendale White also about Jackson and Holmes i think both of those players have a decent chance or being bust and never really doing anything in the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 The signing of LA should have little to no affect on our first choice. Only difference being is that you move off of LB is a must. The Fab Four are still sticking to their advise as given to their contacts and centers of influence in the front office. You go with the best available defensive player at pick 25. Moss ???? Please we already have enough tatooed thugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 The signing of LA should have little to no affect on our first choice. Only difference being is that you move off of LB is a must. The Fab Four are still sticking to their advise as given to their contacts and centers of influence in the front office. You go with the best available defensive player at pick 25. Moss ???? Please we already have enough tatooed thugs. But most likely the best defensive player will be an OLB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 But most likely the best defensive player will be an OLB Then you take him and ease him into the system since he's not going to be an instant impact guy like Hawk could be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 23, 2006 Share Posted April 23, 2006 Both Jackson and Holmes are going most likely in the teens and I'd do cartwheels if they fell to us. But seeing that it won't happen, unless EA is desperate, the only way one of them is in blue is by trading up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now