Plax 4 Prez Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Johnson is not as big of a head case at Owens. Oh and by the way, Chad Johnson had a hell of year in 2007, he played like crap this year because of the instability with the Bengals QB situation and played with a serious shoulder injury. But yeah, Chad Johnson never shows up. 2006 was Chad's big year. He had 'decent' numbers in '07, and in '08 was a loud mouthed cheerleader.I hate TO but anyone in thier right mind would take TO over Chad. Say what you want about TO, but atleast he plays hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 2006 was Chad's big year. He had 'decent' numbers in '07, and in '08 was a loud mouthed cheerleader.I hate TO but anyone in thier right mind would take TO over Chad. Say what you want about TO, but atleast he plays hurt. Seriously, do you even look up the facts before you make judgments? In 2006 Johnson had 87 receptions for 1,369 yards and 7 touchdowns. In 2007 he had 93 receptions for 1,440 yards and 8 touchdowns. In those years Johnson beat out Owens in those 2 categories, but scored more touchdowns. I'll take Chad, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax 4 Prez Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Seriously, do you even look up the facts before you make judgments? In 2006 Johnson had 87 receptions for 1,369 yards and 7 touchdowns. In 2007 he had 93 receptions for 1,440 yards and 8 touchdowns. In those years Johnson beat out Owens in those 2 categories, but scored more touchdowns. I'll take Chad, thanks. ok my bad, your right about '07 2008 Cincinnati Bengals 13 10 53 540 10.2 26 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2007 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 93 1,440 15.5 70T 8 6 47 7.8 16 0 2 1 TOTAL 612 8,905 14.6 82 53 21 143 6.8 18 0 5 2 and he's had a decent career, but TO IMO is still superior in the past 3 years he has 38 TD's compared to Chad's whopping 19. Owens is older so probably just because of age I'd probably take Chad, but TO IMO is still the better player, even though I hate the guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman329 Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Chad has more gas left in the tank than TO. TO is finding it harder and harder to get off the line when jammed and no longer has the explosive speed to burn a defender if he does beat the jam. And you KNOW he'll be the last to see his own decline and will be a major PIA when he's no longer the focal point. Chad is worth a gamble. TO is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now