Jump to content
SportsWrath

NFL Network shows Giants no. 1 need is a long snapper


BleedinBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

Okay, I know that we cut Ryan Kuehl who has been our standard bearer for long snapper, but hasn't Zak DeOssie taken over those duties this past year?

 

There is no way our no. 1 need is a long snapper. The NFL network says we need (in this order), LS, LB, T, WR

 

No mention of CB or safeties.

 

Is the network that far off base...or is it me? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alford did field goals and extra points and DeOssie did punts is what I recall. There were some snapping issues at the beginning of the season and in the Packers game but out of all the positions on a football team I can hardly believe long snapper would even make top 5 for us in terms of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I know that we cut Ryan Kuehl who has been our standard bearer for long snapper, but hasn't Zak DeOssie taken over those duties this past year?

 

There is no way our no. 1 need is a long snapper. The NFL network says we need (in this order), LS, LB, T, WR

 

No mention of CB or safeties.

 

Is the network that far off base...or is it me? :confused:

 

Are you sure they were talking about the Giants? It's weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...