BleedinBlue Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Okay, I know that we cut Ryan Kuehl who has been our standard bearer for long snapper, but hasn't Zak DeOssie taken over those duties this past year? There is no way our no. 1 need is a long snapper. The NFL network says we need (in this order), LS, LB, T, WR No mention of CB or safeties. Is the network that far off base...or is it me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Alford did field goals and extra points and DeOssie did punts is what I recall. There were some snapping issues at the beginning of the season and in the Packers game but out of all the positions on a football team I can hardly believe long snapper would even make top 5 for us in terms of need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Okay, I know that we cut Ryan Kuehl who has been our standard bearer for long snapper, but hasn't Zak DeOssie taken over those duties this past year? There is no way our no. 1 need is a long snapper. The NFL network says we need (in this order), LS, LB, T, WR No mention of CB or safeties. Is the network that far off base...or is it me? Are you sure they were talking about the Giants? It's weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now