randoff

Hilliard was a great receiver when he played for us. does anyone know why we let him go? Another Awful Accorsi decision??

True! But we have Smith, Burress, Tyree and Moss!! Younger guys!

Should the Giants may have went for three with 2 T.O. left? Or being 'content' w/14 is better?

Did oneone see that push in the back?

Refs aint calling anything until the 4th Q......IF the game is close then.

Defense is on the Bucs' ass!!!! I love it!

Are we making adjustments ...I mean....Giblride?....

I can't believe it myself....in game adjustments?

Fuck!!!!!!! YES!

Steve Smith!!!!

I felt like Jacobs did when he scored. If I had a ball (and was at Tampa Stadium) I woulda slammed the ball too!!!!! YES!!!!!

whew!

Steve Smith!!!! Comon' U gotta catch that...you're killin' me!

Giants need to force a turnover......I see at times they are getting pressure.

I would LOVE to see a Buc fumble!

Eli's 'body language' scares me now

I think Rhonde planted a negative seed in the Giants heads.....smart guy, knowing that the Giants came off an emotional loss vs the Pats. Time for Eli and the Offense to 'shake it off' and score at least 3 here.

I noticed that too Lug. Thats why when 9:00 am rolled around I switched to FOX.

I used to dig ESPN...but they are so bad right now. I lost faith in them when Mortenson and co. persisted that Eli had a seperated shulder and was 'definitely' out for 4 weeks. Turned out to be a lie....Eli started the very next week and hasn't missed a game.

Missed it...but I caught that bullshit on "Me-Shawn" possibly coming back to the NFL. O Lordy! Talk about overrated!

....and "Me-shawn" was helping Tampa scout the Giants. Great! :brooding:

You can't look past this game. And you want no part of Dallas.

Well IF the GIANTS win today, I guess theres no other choice but to play Dallas. Say the Giants beat the Bucs....why don't the NFL 'Gods' just NOT allow us to play the Cowboys. Egg, you're pure genius!!!

NE gotta get past the Colts. Ain't they a bit healthier this time around?

Forgot about that! I'm just like the rest of the World (and Mars) assumng the Pats will just be in the Superbowl. Jags, Colts and Chargers may have something to 'say' about that.

An ideal scenario (to me) would be: Giants edge out Tampa Bay 23-20...go to Dallas and blow them out 31- 14, then get to Seattle (I think Seattle beats Green Bay), beat Seattle on the leg of Larry T 15-10....

....rematch those New England Cheat-tri-oits in the Superbowl. YES!!!!

I did not expect 30 TDs but that does not mean he overachieved. It's too early to tell. .....next couple of years along with a decent o-line, and Romo does not come close to these numbers, then I would say he overachieved.

Overachieved

to perform, esp. academically, above the potential indicated by tests of one's mental ability or aptitude.

To perform better or achieve more than expected, esp. by others.

Confirmed:

made certain as to truth, accuracy, validity, availability, etc. Given additional determination; made resolute.

I like my hambergers rare but it doesn't change the fact that the Giants defensive backs cannot survive a combo of Dal, GB or Dal, Seattle. Provided of course, they survive Galloway/Garcia.

Sticks and Stones....ahhh you know the rest...there u go with your facts!!!! You know what....since it's a 'fact' that you are so dead on about football, the Giants and playoffs....your Lotto numbers JUST won me something (albeit a dollar...a chance to play next Sat). Will u be around to slide me some new winning numbers next week?

P.S. Giants play ONE game at a time, not a combo of Dallas, GB and or Seattle....there IS a playoff format. One Team NEVER plays a Combo of other teams on the same day....

Combo:

Informal; The product or result of combining; a combination.

The Combo of statements like very rare and sometimes confuses some of us when talking playoffs, refs calls and 100 points given up by our Giants.

Rarely do I sometimes miss a statement like that.

I'd say it's Very Rare that you do miss those statements. If you did miss that statement it would be because of a conspiracy theory.

I think he meant 100 points in 3 games.

Oh???? Thanks for the clarification. I'd take it (33.3 points) against our D. But we could win 35 to 33.3.

No, but you did say this: "calls affect every game, sometimes"

Oooooh!!!! You saw that too.

09-31-41-24-82-81

Thanks, you're a pal....

....and can I safely bet that IF the 'Boys meet the Giants....the 'Boys will drop 100 points on our sorry D?

Dear Italian Hotdog;

Sometimes....

on certain occasions or in certain cases but not always. At times; now and then.

You are right! But it's very rare: in a high degree; extremely; exceedingly unusual; uncommon. that you are wrong in your own mind!

except in recent playoff games, when they very, very (some may say never) rarely win...now, is this really what it is going to be? semantics of sometimes vs. rarely? clearly the Dog has stumbled into the world of the surreal...semantics and conspiracy theories...perhaps this is a very entertaining place to be...

Very:

in a high degree; extremely; exceedingly: A giant is very tall. (used as an intensive emphasizing superlatives or stressing identity or oppositeness).

Rare:

coming or occurring far apart in time; unusual; uncommon. Thinly distributed over an area; few and widely separated.

Conspiracy:

an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons...

Theory:

a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules or principles. Contemplation or speculation.