i think tuck(and the other personel we have except canty) are better suited for a 4-3, so it would be minimizing their potential play on the field to have them in a 3-4.
i think tuck, kiwi, osi, cofield, alford, all are more effective in a 4-3.
i cant believe this is still being discussed
spending a 1st on WR when WR was one of our strengths because a first round draft pick might not pan out sounds like the dan snyder formula of winning.
Giants and Jets to both play home games at new Meadowlands stadium Week 1
http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/03/giants_and_jets_to_both_play_h.html
im pretty sure nicks is only brought up because he is a ny giant wr who played well enough as a rookie and along with the play of our other wr's makes giving up a #1 for marshall unnecessary.
but when we have the need at MLB that we currently have i think its foolish to spend the 1st on a position that was one of our strongest positions last year.