Heathcliff Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 strength of schedule, strength of opponent...our inability to address our weakest areas of need...doenst look to positive, wouldnt you say ?? Um -- didn't you just acknowledge conceptual parity in the NFL?
Guest Floyd The Barber Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Um -- didn't you just acknowledge conceptual parity in the NFL? we had areas of concern that needed to be addressed, primarily CB and DT...CB was addressed, but only in quantity, not quality...DT was a forgotten area...there is no way we can be competitive with William Joseph as one of the starting DT's and trial by fire as to who the other would be...
Heathcliff Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 we had areas of concern that needed to be addressed, primarily CB and DT...CB was addressed, but only in quantity, not quality...DT was a forgotten area...there is no way we can be competitive with William Joseph as one of the starting DT's and trial by fire as to who the other would be... The way you contradict yourself for the same of maintaining your character is comical.
Guest Drew Rosenhaus Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Given the fact that I represent players from each NFC East team, it's hard to be impartial to just one team However, I would be remiss if I failed to mention that two of my most profitable clients, Plax and Shock play for the division champs!
Guest Lockhart Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 we had areas of concern that needed to be addressed, primarily CB and DT...CB was addressed, but only in quantity, not quality...DT was a forgotten area...there is no way we can be competitive with William Joseph as one of the starting DT's and trial by fire as to who the other would be... I agree - an aging veteran with questionable durability and a rookie that appeared lsot last season as starters at cornerback - losing Clancy. These things point to a deterioration, not an improvement of the defense. Meanwhile, the other NFC East teams have vastly improved themselves in the off-season.
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Given the fact that I represent players from each NFC East team, it's hard to be impartial to just one team However, I would be remiss if I failed to mention that two of my most profitable clients, Plax and Shock play for the division champs! And may I say that your two most profitable clients folded like cheap suits when asked to perform when it mattered most. Then again word on South Beach is you have the same problem........in the bedroom.
420 Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 And may I say that your two most profitable clients folded like cheap suits when asked to perform when it mattered most. Then again word on South Beach is you have the same problem........in the bedroom. Leave it to you to take a conversation about FB that was going rather well and put in the dumpster.
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Leave it to you to take a conversation about FB that was going rather well and put in the dumpster. Go eat some turnbuckles !!
420 Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 Go shave your back !! Go think you are better than Mel Brooks and fail miserably then die from the same thing that brought you fame.
Guest Drew Rosenhaus Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 And may I say that your two most profitable clients folded like cheap suits when asked to perform when it mattered most. Then again word on South Beach is you have the same problem........in the bedroom. Rest assure that just like I'm a shark at the negotiating table, the same applies in the bedroom Shock and Plax didn't play particularly well, but then again, who did? One of the best rbs in the NFL, Tiki Barber, was held to a season low 41 yards rushing The defense was destroyed by DeShaun Foster for over 150 yards and Eli Manning threw for 113 yards and 3 INTs yet Shock still managed to garner 50 of those yards
Gspotter Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 The Internet is a funny place where men, boys, and probably 4 girls total get together to talk and sign in with multiple names and talk shit. It's the biggest waste ever. It's almost like Public Access: a noble idea where open communication could be had by all free of advertising, now populated by Star Trek geeks, light porn, and the ocassional environmentalist.
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 13, 2006 Posted April 13, 2006 The Internet is a funny place where men, boys, and probably 4 girls total get together to talk and sign in with multiple names and talk shit. It's the biggest waste ever. It's almost like Public Access: a noble idea where open communication could be had by all free of advertising, now populated by Star Trek geeks, light porn, and the ocassional environmentalist. OK........and your point is ??
Guest Carbo Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 The Internet is a funny place where men, boys, and probably 4 girls total get together to talk and sign in with multiple names and talk shit. It's the biggest waste ever. It's almost like Public Access: a noble idea where open communication could be had by all free of advertising, now populated by Star Trek geeks, light porn, and the ocassional environmentalist. Yet, you persist.
Heathcliff Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 OK........and your point is ?? His point is: you're an example. I don't think it could be any more straight forward; then again, you're hardly one to understand anything beyond an oh-so dark persona.
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 His point is: you're an example. I don't think it could be any more straight forward; then again, you're hardly one to understand anything beyond an oh-so dark persona. Please do not leave me in this abyss !!!
420 Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 Please do not leave me in this abyss !!! If you see a bright light run to it.
Guest Nutty Sack Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 If you see a bright light run to it. Figures..........I understand completely now.........very typical.
420 Posted April 14, 2006 Posted April 14, 2006 Figures..........I understand completely now.........very typical. Typical is a word you understand well. As is redundant.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now