Mr. P

well to be fair we had no idea what kind of defensive coordinator spags would be either.

i like the move too. and the more i think about it the more i believe a decent DC will adapt his schemes to the teams strength and personnel. which in my opinion is a 4-3 defense still.

thats pretty much what happened. he also locked him in a closet of some sort too.

Directed the Bills 2008 defense that ranked 2nd best in the AFC in negative yardage plays…recorded 7 games of holding opposing offenses to less than 100 yards rushing...his Bills defense finished 4th in the NFL in Red-Zone defense (41.8%)…allowed just 14 passing TDs during the ’08 season which was 4th best in the NFL, despite losing his best pass rusher (Schobel) in the early part of the season 1985-1986 UNC (special assistant) 1987 Army Black Knights (assistant coach) 1988-1991 Kent State Golden Flashes (defensive assistant) 1992-1994 Army Black Knights (defensive assistant) 1995-1997 Vanderbilt Commodores (assistant head coach) (defensive backs coach) 1998-2002 Jacksonville Jaguars (defensive backs coach) 2003-2004 St. Louis Rams (defensive backs coach) 2005 Chicago Bears (defensive backs coach) 2006-2009 Buffalo Bills (defensive coordinator) 2009-2010 Buffalo Bills (interim head coach) (defensive coordinator)

i brought his name up a while back

the thing with crennel is can he coach a 4-3. because in a 3-4 your linebackers have to be good. ours are not.

from the other thread, about you:

http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/01/ny_giants_qb_eli_manning_will_1.html

when its official then i will pop the champagne

The first 20 spots are locked in, but the remaining slots can still change depending on the playoff results. Team record and strength of schedule (SOS) are in parentheses. 1) St. Louis (1-15, .520) 2) Detroit (2-14, .523) 3) Tampa Bay (3-13, .555) 4) Washington (4-12, .492) 5) Kansas City (4-12, .516) 6) Seattle (5-11, .477) 7) Cleveland (5-11, .512) 8) Oakland (5-11, .527) 9) Buffalo (6-10, .516) 10-11) Chicago (7-9, .496) 10-11) Jacksonville (7-9, .496) 12) Miami (7-9, .559) 13) San Francisco (8-8, .477) 14) Denver (8-8, .527) 15) NY Giants (8-8, .535) 16-17) Tennessee (8-8, .539) 16-17) Carolina (8-8, .539) 18) Pittsburgh (9-7, .488) 19-20) Atlanta (9-7, .504) 19-20) Houston (9-7, .504) Subject to Change: 21) New York Jets (9-7, .516) 22) Baltimore (9-7, .523) 23) Arizona (10-6, .445) 24) Cincinnati (10-6, .492) 25) New England (10-6, .516) 26) Green Bay (11-5, .441) 27) Philadelphia (11-5, .484) 28) Dallas (11-5, .488) 29) Minnesota (12-4, .441) 30) San Diego (13-3, .453) 31) New Orleans (13-3, .426) [super Bowl Loser] 32) Indianapolis (14-2, .473) [super Bowl Winner] The three tied teams will be decided by coin flip prior to the draft because all three involve teams from two different conferences. Tiebreaking Procedures The draft tiebreakers are as follows: 1) Super Bowl Winner picks 32nd 2) Super Bowl Loser picks 31st 3) Teams are ranked in inverse order of their record. Ties count as a half win and half loss. 4) A playoff team always picks after a non-playoff team with the same regular season record. If two playoff teams have the same regular season record, but one was eliminated in an earlier round, that team picks first. 5) Ties are then broken using strength of schedule (average of all 16 opponent's winning percentage, divisionmates count twice since they were played twice. Or count the wins of all opponents, same result). Weaker schedule picks earlier. 6) If SOS fails to break the tie, and the teams are in the same division, apply the division playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher). 7) If SOS fails to break the tie, the teams are not in the same division, but the teams are in the same conference, apply the conference playoff tiebreakers (except the "loser" picks higher). 8) If the teams are still tied, or are in different conferences, a coin toss decides the order. If three teams are tied such that the tie can be broken as to two teams, but not between any of those two and a third team, the "loser" of the two-team tie flips against the other team first. A scenario where all three teams are stone tied is nearly impossible since there are only two conferences and intraconference tiebreakers go very deep before a coin flip. 2009 NFL Strength of Schedule After Regular Season 1) Miami (.559) 2) Tampa Bay (.555) 3) Carolina (.539) 3) Tennessee (.539) 5) NY Giants (.535) 6) Denver (.527) 6) Oakland (.527) 8) Baltimore (.523) 8) Detroit (.523) 10) St. Louis (.520) 11) NY Jets (.516) 11) Kansas City (.516) 11) Buffalo (.516) 11) New England (.516) 15) Cleveland (.512) 16) Houston (.504) 16) Atlanta (.504) 18) Chicago (.496) 18) Jacksonville (.496) 20) Cincinnati (.492) 20) Washington (.492) 22) Dallas (.488) 22) Pittsburgh (.488) 24) Philadelphia (.484) 25) San Francisco (.477) 25) Seattle (.477) 27) Indianapolis (.473) 28) San Diego (.453) 29) Arizona (.445) 30) Green Bay (.441) 30) Minnesota (.441) 32) New Orleans (.426) http://www.east-coast-bias.com/2010/01/2010-nfl-draft-order-after-regular.html Giants with the 15th can get a impact player

just liked we'd never win a superbowl with pierce starting at MLB right

i hate those bastards i sometimes think about rooting for them because they are also new york but fuck that shit. if im gonna root for a different ny team itd be the bills over the jets.

i dont see it happening this offseason but its possible.

either way hes not going anywhere.

giants should just bench everybody possible

ive said that as well. sheridan and the players are both to blame. i remember reading and repeating a quote earlier in the season that "the players out there could get lombardi fired"

horrible

id love for us to get dqwell jackson, barrett ruud, kirk morrison. one of those guys.

ok so goff just isnt very good

steve smith is the first WR for either Giants or Jets with 100 receptions

at least steve got his 100 catches and eli made a hell of a play to beckum

ok so its not a catch but could that have been played any worse by dockery?