fishgutmartyr Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Okay forget the subjective lists. Mike Singletary>Ray Lewis Carl Banks was a top 50 linebacker regardless of who he played with. Carl Banks in his prime would have been the star linebacker on most every other team back then. I would have definitely taken Banks over Armstead. He made tackles with surgical precision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I would have definitely taken Banks over Armstead. He made tackles with surgical precision. Yes....and he was a very intelligent player. I don't know if you can put a statistic on how well he played his position....he was always in the right position, which meant alot of time, the ball carrier was forced to another area of the field, where someone else made the tackle. I remember that initially, alot of teams tried to run away from Taylor, which meant flowing to Banks.....but that didn't work either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Okay forget the subjective lists. Mike Singletary>Ray Lewis Carl Banks was a top 50 linebacker regardless of who he played with. Carl Banks in his prime would have been the star linebacker on most every other team back then. If I had to build my team around a middle linebacker, I'd take Singletary over Lewis. But really, either of them are among the best to ever play the position, so it's kind of like Batman v. Spiderman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 I would have definitely taken Banks over Armstead. He made tackles with surgical precision. might've been that scalpel in his elbow pad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksm7 Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Okay forget the subjective lists. Mike Singletary>Ray Lewis Carl Banks was a top 50 linebacker regardless of who he played with. Carl Banks in his prime would have been the star linebacker on most every other team back then. the dog is not agreeing or disagreeing with you - just offering a reason or two as to why he would not be inlcuded...whether or not people agree is based on their own subjective feelings much like these lists. Way too hard to come up with top lists of players in history because the game changes so radically over time, and so does roles and responsibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now