Herc Posted June 6, 2009 Share Posted June 6, 2009 so i should major in geography AND join the basketball team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishgutmartyr Posted June 6, 2009 Author Share Posted June 6, 2009 I dislike you immensely. You are a bigger attention whore than I. Nah, I'm not posting in this one until now, so it's not really trying to get attention. I'm just a trouble-maker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Intra-franchise rushing yard records and turnover differential (which is just as much on the D as the O) from 2000? That's your evidence for him being the #2 OC in the league? Your comments on the Jordan statistical anomaly only highlight the failure of your argument: You claim the poor performance of the team is due to one or two personel issues skewing the data. How influential can the OC be then? Again, surely one of the best OCs in the league could at least squeeze a mediocre season out of a less stable team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksm7 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Intra-franchise rushing yard records and turnover differential (which is just as much on the D as the O) from 2000? That's your evidence for him being the #2 OC in the league? Your comments on the Jordan statistical anomaly only highlight the failure of your argument: You claim the poor performance of the team is due to one or two personel issues skewing the data. How influential can the OC be then? Again, surely one of the best OCs in the league could at least squeeze a mediocre season out of a less stable team. hmmm...very slow indeed. the dog recomends you reread the thread in its entirity, and then you can get a better sense of what evidence the dog has argued the justification for him... the dog has maintained that the chiefs had less than average talent, and the key to their offense was out for 25% of the season...so again, your second paragraph makes no sense here...and the jordan piece speaks to someone like yourself only skimming the top of the numbers without going any deeper...the dog sure hopes you are not in the medical proffession...the misdiagnosis of an illness due to your inability to see beyond the first level would be devestating... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMFP Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 ...and maybe crank up a little Europe 72, eh? Nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 God, I'm not going to waste any more time explaining the obvious to your dumb ass Dog. You're only here to be a douchebag as you keep proving. Keep trying to convince everyone you're smarter though. I should have know better than to bother with your troll comments in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksm7 Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 God, I'm not going to waste any more time explaining the obvious to your dumb ass Dog. You're only here to be a douchebag as you keep proving. Keep trying to convince everyone you're smarter though. I should have know better than to bother with your troll comments in the first place. look, the dog wasn't trying to be argumentative when initially stating that chan gailey's ranking wasn't so out oft he question...why is it so hard to credit him? his career demonstrates success. you want to rate him because his overall offensive numbers were weak last year. the dog simply showed why that may be, and supported why he is considered a good OC based on his career. you reduce it to name calling and little backing to counter anything the dog has said otherwise. that's fine. you're very entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 look, the dog wasn't trying to be argumentative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerseygiantfan Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nah, I'm not posting in this one until now, so it's not really trying to get attention. I'm just a trouble-maker. You're right you are! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now