lemmiwinks Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 QB 1 G---Com---Att---Com%---Yards-----YPA---TD---INT--- qb rate 12-- 134--- 265--- 50.6---- 1,743--- 6.58-- 13--- 14---- 66.0 13--- 193--- 402--- 48.0--- 2,321--- 5.77--- 15--- 19--- 58.9 QB 2 G---Com---Att---Com%---Yards-----YPA---TD---INT--- qb rate 7--- 95 ----197-- 48.2----- 1043----- 5.29---6---- 9 ----- 55.4 16-- 294---557-- 52.8 -----3762------ 6.75--24---17----- 75.9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firstnten Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 QB #3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmiwinks Posted March 30, 2006 Author Share Posted March 30, 2006 QB #3 Yeah I would take him too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUND Posted March 30, 2006 Share Posted March 30, 2006 I don't know what point you're trying to make but no comparison of quarterbacks is valid based off just two years of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmiwinks Posted March 30, 2006 Author Share Posted March 30, 2006 I don't know what point you're trying to make but no comparison of quarterbacks is valid based off just two years of play. Thanks captain obvious Well there are certain posters on this board that feel as though you can judge a QB on his first full year starting....So I compared Eli 's first 2 years to a QB 1's first 2 years.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUND Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Thanks captain obvious Well there are certain posters on this board that feel as though you can judge a QB on his first full year starting....So I compared Eli 's first 2 years to a QB 1's first 2 years.... So 1 year isn't enough but two years is? I still don't understand what point you're trying to make. Which means you're not doing a good job of making it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesShowMeTheWay Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 So 1 year isn't enough but two years is? I still don't understand what point you're trying to make. Which means you're not doing a good job of making it. There are 2 years probably since that would make a more even comparison. I don't really get the point of the thread either since football is a team sport and not an individual sport. Just ask Peyton or Dan Marino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmiwinks Posted March 31, 2006 Author Share Posted March 31, 2006 So 1 year isn't enough but two years is? I still don't understand what point you're trying to make. Which means you're not doing a good job of making it. Ok They think QB1 is a HOF QB......They think after 2 years (one full) QB2 is a bust... My point is that you cant judge a QB after his first 2 years if you could then QB 1 was a bust...I have no Idea if that made sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lockhart Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I'll take the young QB that won a Super Bowl in his second season over the overpaid little brother of a great QB who has a weak arm and no control over his passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmiwinks Posted March 31, 2006 Author Share Posted March 31, 2006 I'll take the young QB that won a Super Bowl in his second season over the overpaid little brother of a great QB who has a weak arm and no control over his passes. Same bull shit from the same ass munching ball licker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now