CrazedDogs Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 the team's been pretty shitty for a while and he was still producing. still, you might be right or i might be right but do you wan to spend a 3rd round pick trying to find out? Maybe. He'd be worth giving a workout. If he's only lost a step and not three or four as the stats would indicate then he's better than Plax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 all things equal(meaning no suspension, no jail time) you think holt minus 1 step is better than burress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MakeMeSomeFoodHo Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 holt and pace are both washed up. I wouldnt trade a 3rd rounder for either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksm7 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 holt has 2 possibly 3 good years left in him, and in the event that burress isn't available, the dog would say he may not be a bad pick up when your options are hixon and smith as the number 1...can't judge him on last years numbers, as that team was in flux and extremely unstable. the two years prior he had 90 plus catches in both, so the dog thinks he is still potentially productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 Steve Largent is available. Definently a third rounder for him if Mark Ingram avoids jail time, but i heard Ingram is public enemy #1 in Bloombergs eyes so i think hes looking at 25 to life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxi-xxv Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 the arguement against Torry Holt is that he is old, the arguement for him is that his team has sucked and he has had no o line etc etc. I think he is still productive on a good team, but I would take Gonzalez first. 96 catches 10 tds on an awful team with an awful Qb and no o line. He is tall athletic and can block well still. Gonzo would be the guy as my first choice, Holt would be next .... of course if Boldin were not available that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 i dont think thigpen is awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 i dont think thigpen is awful I agree. KC should be building their team around him instead of trying to replace him. Give that team a decent Oline and a real defense and they will do well, especially against the AFC West. He put up good numbers against some tough defenses. Give him some better skill players and a better running game and he will get the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now