Lughead Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 PHILADELPHIA — With the decoder ring of hindsight, it was clear from head coach Scott Linehan's comments that the St. Louis Rams were wary -- to the point of terror -- of one particular Eagles player. "I don't know how you defend (Brian) Westbrook," Linehan said, a few days prior to the Eagles' 38-3 season-opening victory over his Rams at Lincoln Financial Field. "You really do your best to keep him from going crazy on you." Score one for St. Louis. Westbrook didn't "go crazy." In fact, despite scoring two of Philadelphia's five touchdowns, he was pretty sane. The Eagles' All-Pro running back rushed the ball 19 times for 91 quiet yards and his score, and he caught two passes for one yard and the game's first touchdown. The last time he ended a game with fewer than those 92 total yards from scrimmage was a 75-yard performance on Oct. 15, 2006, at New Orleans. There were a couple of reasons that the most important piece of the Eagles' offense didn't have a party on the unit's best day, and most of them are positive. The first, hinted at by Linehan's comments, was St. Louis, which turned its defensive game plan toward frustrating No. 36. This isn't an innovative strategy, and it won't be the last time it's employed. But it has a real element of risk, and until Sunday, the Eagles had not made an opponent pay full price. The Eagles' wide receivers, aided by single coverage all game long, showed the ability to win those favorable matchups. DeSean Jackson, Hank Baskett and Greg Lewis were not only open, but they made catches, something they had not done during a butter-fingered preseason. Perhaps the trio of 100-yard receiving days posted by Jackson, Baskett and Lewis will have future opponents thinking harder before keying on Westbrook, especially when starting wideouts Kevin Curtis and Reggie Brown are healthy enough to return to the mix. The Eagles' play calling was another reason for No. 36's relative absence from the spotlight. "With the way they play their defense, we wanted to do a couple of things in our pass game, and we got that accomplished," Eagles offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg said. "The other thing was we were getting Brian in and out of the game, keep him fresh for the fourth quarter. We didn't need that today, but we certainly could at some point." In other words, Westbrook represented another gear that the Philadelphia offense never even came close to needing. Quarterback Donovan McNabb provided the Eagles with more than enough horsepower on Sunday, passing for 361 yards and three scores. The last decade's record has proven the Andy Reid will go to No. 5 first, and look for other options if McNabb cannot get the job done. For the past season and a half, since the quarterback's knee injury in the middle of the 2005 season, the next option has been Westbrook. Now that McNabb appears to have regained his Pro Bowl form, Westbrook may be headed back to the complementary role that previously frustrated him. For now, however, he says he's satisfied with victory. "Coach (Reid) had a game play as far as how many touches he wanted me to have and how he wanted me to go about running the ball," Westbrook said. "The way Don was throwing the ball and the receivers were wide open, it's hard to go away from that. "It's difficult to take the ball out of (McNabb's) hands when he's having so much success." The Eagles' next opponent is Dallas, the consensus favorite to win the NFC East and represent the NFC in the Super Bowl. The Cowboys are aware of what McNabb is capable of, but it was Westbrook who hurt them in 2006, amassing 299 yards from scrimmage over two meetings, including an upset at Texas Stadium. That Week 15 Eagles victory may be best remembered for Westbrook passing up a touchdown, instead sliding down at the 1-yard line to ice the game at the two-minute warning. Dallas isn't going to forget about No. 36. The Eagles shouldn't either. Transaction The Eagles tweaked their eight-man practice squad on Tuesday, signing rookie free agent defensive back Jonathan Hefney, formerly a four-year starter at the University of Tennessee. To make room for Hefney, Philadelphia released cornerback Kyle Arrington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Teams make adjustments. Don't expect the Giants to run up the score.. not to mention the Giants go conservative after scoring a TD :brooding: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted September 10, 2008 Author Share Posted September 10, 2008 Teams make adjustments. Don't expect the Giants to run up the score.. not to mention the Giants go conservative after scoring a TD :brooding: there is one adjustment they can make. Put more db's/lb's in to cover our Wr's/TE's leaving room for Jacobs /Ward and Bradshaw. and when they adjust back to stop them well you know the routine.... or should Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allstarjim Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 The point is that the Rams are not as tough a team as the Giants. That is why they will lose. The Giants are tough both lines, the Rams are just not. I see the Giants rushing for 200+ yards in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 The point is that the Rams are not as tough a team as the Giants. That is why they will lose. The Giants are tough both lines, the Rams are just not. I see the Giants rushing for 200+ yards in this one. But the Giants do have a habit of making every game a nail biter... don't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 The point is that the Rams are not as tough a team as the Giants. That is why they will lose. The Giants are tough both lines, the Rams are just not. I see the Giants rushing for 200+ yards in this one. That is very possible, but dont be surprised if there is an aerial assault led by one Eli Manning. I remember the last time we faced the Rams we torched them by 20+ points and Eli had a big game. With more confidence now he could really air it out. But I do agree, a big ground game is likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jranieli Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I don't want to see him air it out. I want to see good QB efficiency from Eli and a great defensive showing. I would be happy with 235 yards, 2 TD's from Eli. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGBLUE01 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I don't want to see him air it out. I want to see good QB efficiency from Eli and a great defensive showing. I would be happy with 235 yards, 2 TD's from Eli. Hell yeah, me too. I just remeber the last time Eli torched em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lubeck Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I don't want to see him air it out. I want to see good QB efficiency from Eli and a great defensive showing. I would be happy with 235 yards, 2 TD's from Eli. 235 and 2 TDs a game is more than enough for this team to win. What will matter the most is when the run game is being stifled and Eli needs to compensate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylorized56 Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 I was surprised not see Bradshaw in the 4th quarter last week. I guess we didn't need him but I would bet he gets a share this weekend even if it's only a handful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted September 10, 2008 Author Share Posted September 10, 2008 I was surprised not see Bradshaw in the 4th quarter last week. I guess we didn't need him but I would bet he gets a share this weekend even if it's only a handful. That was Coughlin's fault He even admitted to it LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now