so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Yeah, trust me, its you. Oh yes, because you've seen him so much in buttfuck,Texas... I forget. [qoute] Of course, Mike Williams was open in every play he was in, its just the QB couldn't get the ball to him. Lol, they had 3 #1 WR's all within the top 5, lets blame the one from USC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Yeah, trust me, its you. Oh yes, because you've seen him so much in buttfuck,Texas... I forget. Of course, Mike Williams was open in every play he was in, its just the QB couldn't get the ball to him. Lol, they had 3 #1 WR's all within the top 5, lets blame the one from USC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Oh yes, because you've seen him so much in buttfuck,Texas... I forget. <_> Other than the fact that USC gets nationally televised almost every saturday, yeah, I saw play alot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Lol, they had 3 #1 WR's all within the top 5, lets blame the one from USC... Ok, Roy Williams - Pro Bowl Charles Rogers - Always hurt, release this past off-season. Mike Williams - Bench warmer, Why? Too slow to get open. First 13 games of the 2006 season, he had 1 catch for 7 yards. Mike Furrey 98 catches and over a 1000 yards. Yep, it was QB's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Other than the fact that USC gets nationally televised almost every saturday, yeah, I saw play alot. Nem, all I can say is you'd have to be a moron not to like this choice at our position. He's blue chip, and in 3 years you'll be saying you wanted us to draft him all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Nem, all I can say is you'd have to be a moron not to like this choice at our position. He's blue chip, and in 3 years you'll be saying you wanted us to draft him all along. The only moron is you. forgive me if I don't see the Randy Moss in him. Maybe I need to smoke more crack for that to happen. I guess you're right though. We have Burress, Shockey, Toomer, Moss coming back to play WR. Forget the fact that we don't have a LT, a CB, or LB. We need a 4.7 running WR. Idiot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 The only moron is you. forgive me if I don't see the Randy Moss in him. Maybe I need to smoke more crack for that to happen. I guess you're right though. We have Burress, Shockey, Toomer, Moss coming back to play WR. Forget the fact that we don't have a LT, a CB, or LB. We need a 4.7 running WR. Idiot! Hey, keep it on the DL, but when do you want to smoke some crack wit me? Seriously, from one moron to another... We could slam it, maybe a lil smokee, now wha I mean?... I'm sure you do. You could strap me, I could strap you, we'd be best friends...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Tommorow YOU will ALL be shocked: Adrian Peterson will slip right into the Giants hands. Or the Giants will draft Marshawn Lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastershake Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 In my mock i had us taking FS/DB Michael Griffin from texas... I'd be happy with T Staley too, though Reese said he's happy with Diehl at LT (he may have been feigning this though so Staley or Levi Brown might fall to us, you know how Gms etc get near draft day). Also wouldn't mind OLB John Beason i like him more than Polowsky and Timmons..... CB Darrel Revis or Leon Hall, FS/CB Reggie Nelson would be steals if either fell that far, but i don't think they will so i have the gmen selecting Griffin. I really don't want us to take a reciever, but i wouldn't mind Ted Ginn if he fell to us, and maybe Jarrett. Ideally, trade down 4-5 spots, pick up another pick or two and draft Griffin or Beason. Maybe OT/OG Aaron Sears or taht guard from texas at that point (assuming staley is gone) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 I'm almost 99% positive we dont draft defense with the 1st round pick. Too much depth defensively in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaginCaucasian Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 In my mock i had us taking FS/DB Michael Griffin from texas... I'd be happy with T Staley too, though Reese said he's happy with Diehl at LT (he may have been feigning this though so Staley or Levi Brown might fall to us, you know how Gms etc get near draft day). Also wouldn't mind OLB John Beason i like him more than Polowsky and Timmons..... CB Darrel Revis or Leon Hall, FS/CB Reggie Nelson would be steals if either fell that far, but i don't think they will so i have the gmen selecting Griffin. I really don't want us to take a reciever, but i wouldn't mind Ted Ginn if he fell to us, and maybe Jarrett. Ideally, trade down 4-5 spots, pick up another pick or two and draft Griffin or Beason. Maybe OT/OG Aaron Sears or taht guard from texas at that point (assuming staley is gone) OK, so you see us taking half the guys slated to go in the first round...... great job! Wanna try narrowing that down a bit, we will (barring any Accorsi-like stupidity) only have 1 first round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 OK, so you see us taking half the guys slated to go in the first round...... great job! Wanna try narrowing that down a bit, we will (barring any Accorsi-like stupidity) only have 1 first round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastershake Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 as I said, i have us taking DB Michael Griffin.... for the others, (which are populat on this board, and on mock drafts) i was just saying whether or not i'd be content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 OK, so you see us taking half the guys slated to go in the first round...... great job! Wanna try narrowing that down a bit, we will (barring any Accorsi-like stupidity) only have 1 first round pick. Harsh, but funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastershake Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Harsh, but funny I actually might lose sleep over that post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virginia Giant Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Staley wont help Eli any more than me at LT. He's a project. Now Jarrett on the other hand has hands made of fly paper, can leap very high(which BTW is nice for Eli who likes over throwing), and runs routes very well. Maybe it's me, but Jarrett has a Randy Moss thing about him, and I'm not talking attitude. LMAO, it's definately you. I know you like the guy, but lets not get crazy. Say he's a great receiver, talented, one of the best you've seen, but lets not compare a slowish WR. Truth be told i wouldn't get pissed if Jarret was drafted by us, though honestly I think Bowe is better. BTW, my Staley pick was who i thought we would take, not who i wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 You know, Jerry Rice wasn't fast at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 LET'S DRAFT A DEFENSIVE END BECAUSE "YOU CAN NEVER HAVE ENOUGH PASS RUSHERS"™ accorsi is gone. we dont have to worry about that anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 You know, Jerry Rice wasn't fast at all. Yeah, but he didn't run a 4.7... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Yeah, but he didn't run a 4.7... He did run a 4.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 accorsi is gone. we dont have to worry about that anymore. We need 11 DE on the field at one time...all running at the QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 LET'S DRAFT A DEFENSIVE END BECAUSE "YOU CAN NEVER HAVE ENOUGH PASS RUSHERS"™ Proved to be a true statement....think about when Osi and Stray went down....Mathias didn't do too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 He did run a 4.7 Zing!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 He did run a 4.7 BS, he ran a 4.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 BS, he ran a 4.5. You're right, I'm lying. Linkage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now