Jump to content
SportsWrath

Herc

Members
  • Posts

    29,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Herc

  1. they dont run enough to scare anyone, but jones is still a talented player who might not play--that can only help us
  2. he's back this week.....finally. i've won 7 in a row in my money league, 8-2 and now i got andre johnson back. i get larry johnson back by the playoffs it's all over
  3. i got lj, jacobs, kevin jones, and graham, i thought i had a ton of depth but i might be down to 2 rbs now
  4. yeah but im pretty sure he's going to play. i got him too but there's no way im playing him against the giants d. thank god schaub got healthy
  5. me too, luckily i have earnest graham to back him up
  6. Nov 13 The Lions are considered holding Jones (foot) out of Sunday's game against the Giants in order to preserve him for the Thanksgiving Day contest against the Packers, MLive.com reports. Recommendation: Jones has needed four or five days to let his foot fully recover after each game, and it complicates matters further that he had to leave Sunday's loss to Arizona twice because of soreness in his surgically-repaired left foot. With the Thanksgiving Day game, he'd be very doubtful to play next Thursday against Green Bay in the wake of a Sunday contest against the Giants. We'll see if this is something the Lions plan on following through with leading into Sunday, but Jones owners may want to scoop T.J. Duckett up off the waiver wire just to hedge their bets for the next two games. -from rotowire.com His numbers aint great but he's only played in 7 games, and he's scored a TD in 5 of those games. After him there's a serious dropoff in talent as tj duckett would start for them if he doesn't. they don't run the ball much anyway (jones only ran 4 times last week but scored) but not having jones in there could seriously help us out as we most certainly would never have to put 8 in the box
  7. im not talking about the trade, im talking about how good all 3 players are
  8. i'll be honest, im not that sold on gb either, but they are still a team with 1 loss so in retrospect they are a team that we weren't supposed to beat.
  9. at least we can take rivers out of this argument
  10. i think we are 3rd in the NFL in 3rd and short efficiency, and i can understand it cuz droughns is a bruiser too, but i just think we aren't playing our best hand in these situations and i really hope it doesn't end up biting us in the ass
  11. yeah we've beaten the teams we're supposed to beat and have lost to the teams we were supposed to lose to, and both those teams are a combined 16-2 (or something like that). there's really no shame in being in the situation we're in right now. my only fear is that we'll fall apart after this big game like we fell apart after the bears game last season--but that remains to be seen. eli and coughlin are really going to be tested these last 7 games
  12. the game plan was sound but i think the situational playcalling was atrocious. i also think droughns should've gotten more carries in the first half to keep jacobs fresh for the 2nd half. i mean ward spelled jacobs a LOT when he was healthy and droughns has proven that he is a capable runner even in the role as a featured back, he's a great asset to have considering what we gave up for him so why not utilize him more? oh and i think the giants are absolutely retarded for designating droughns as the short yardage/goal line back. yeah when you have a guy like jacobs as a reserve and the starter is a guy like tiki barber it makes sense to use the big guy as the goal line back, but droughns is no better in this role as jacobs was last year and no better in any short yardage situation as jacobs is, so why do it?
  13. hey the yankees had their day as far as winning and shit talking goes, let the sox fans have theirs.
  14. agreed 100%. i can't count how many times i thought the playcalling drove me nuts this season and last--even in wins. the truth is eli and plax have bailed out the play calling a ton this season
  15. we didn't get it done because the cowboys played better than us down the stretch. yeah it's not what we wnated to happen but we went toe-to-toe with the best team in the NFC twice, and all 3 of our losses have come to two teams who have 1 loss each. we gotta forget it, move onto the next game, and work on getting better so we can take our vengence in the playoffs. the season is FAR from over for us
  16. jacobs averaged over 4 yards per carry before getting hurt in game 1, and he had 95 yards today and would've broken 100 yards and added a td had it not been for one of the holding calls you mentioned above.
  17. the cowboys are better. the end.
  18. i was talking about the injuries. the guy came here claiming they were mentl and he could stop them, so he made his own bed as far as me giving him any injury excuses
  19. do these writers ever learn? were they not paying attention in the 2nd half since coughlin has been here? i have high hopes too, but they are extremely tempered thanks to coughlin's 2nd half history.
  20. they can trade for the orioles closer chris ray. or maybe find ray ordonez and sign him
  21. now their name just sounds stupid. tampa rays? tampa bay rays?
  22. i dont think all those cfs are gonna get 10 mil, if only 1 or 2 of them were available then yeah but the supply side is a little high this offseason and that doesn't benefit any of them. either way, expecting to fill that cf need with a trade for santana limits the number of trade offers and limits the amount or quality of trade prospects they'd get in return.
  23. most managers aren't good with their bullpens
  24. there are 5 millin center fielders on the market this offseason, why not just sign one instead of trading for one (with santana involved no less)
×
×
  • Create New...