CrazedDogs Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 When there's about 6 guys he could be targeting on most pass plays, that's pretty bad...that's almost 40% of the picks targeting one player... 40% of picks in Randle's direction... 23% of passes in Randle's direction... Eli isn't the (only) problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 40% of picks in Randle's direction... 23% of passes in Randle's direction... Eli isn't the (only) problem. Like I said many times before, Randle is a Manningham 2.0 with the edge given to a healthy Manningham over a healthy Randle. Our strarting 3 WRs in 2015 can be lethal with one major addition at the X spot... be it a draft pick (just not in the first round... or even the 2nd for that matter) or a FA in Dez Bryant (at least to drive up the cost for Jerry Jones). Injuries this year which are fucking insane have done us in... we're a very good OL and a very good WR away from being a top 10 offense again... It's the D that's been the problem and I don't care that they decided to "show up" against the 9ers... The 9ers aren't known to be a great offensive team anyway and Capirnick (sp) bails them out with his legs. So much for the "passing league", Reese ignored the LB position and now it's biting us in the ass... hard. Focus on that and please send Kiwi into retirement, he's slower than shit out there.. and get Bromely into game situations NOW so next year he's more than ready... JPP isn't a super start either.. he shows up one game and disappears the next 3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Just read an article that Dallas is willing to franchise Bryant to keep him...even if that makes Murray available in FA. We're not getting Dez Bryant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Just read an article that Dallas is willing to franchise Bryant to keep him...even if that makes Murray available in FA. We're not getting Dez Bryant. He'll be pissed off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightFire Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Just read an article that Dallas is willing to franchise Bryant to keep him...even if that makes Murray available in FA. We're not getting Dez Bryant. This will definitely happen if no contract. With the Dallas line a RB is not a priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 This will definitely happen if no contract. With the Dallas line a RB is not a priority. And Murray has had health issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 there is 0 chance we get dez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman329 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 there is 0 chance we get dez Or less. Move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Was just reading an article on the number of FA the Cowboys have. They'll have some interesting moves to make this offseason... http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2014/11/18/7237373/dallas-cowboys-free-agent-dez-bryant-demarco-murray-rolando-mcclain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazedDogs Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 haha, I don't really want Dez, but the more we can do to totally fuck over Dallas the better. Would be a good time for a little friendly tampering, hehehe... put some good shit in Dez's ear and make him a total distraction to Dallas in 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 At some stage, the quarterback has to look up and say, dont throw it, hes not there. THIS. "Thrown in Randle's direction" means jack shit if there's two defenders in the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 THIS. "Thrown in Randle's direction" means jack shit if there's two defenders in the way. To those who claim that interceptions coming off tipped balls aren't on Eli, you could say the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazedDogs Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 THIS. "Thrown in Randle's direction" means jack shit if there's two defenders in the way. well sure, the QB owns every ball that leaves his hand, but if you're doing serious analysis you still have to ask why a disproportionate amount of inaccurate passes go towards Randle. Look at the INT rate, its almost twice as high when going towards Randle. He's also about a 3-4 % point drag on the passing game's completion percentage. Its not like Eli has been an All Pro when going to the other receivers either, but when the stats are so lopsided towards one player, good or bad, that sure tells us something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now